• Gunmen stormed a concert hall in Moscow on Friday, killing at least 60 people and injuring more than 100.
  • Earlier this month, the US embassy issued a security alert warning of a potential terror attack.
  • Just days ago, Vladimir Putin dismissed the idea as “blackmail” from the West.

Earlier this month, the US embassy in Russia issued a security alert warning about a potential terror attack in Moscow and urged people to avoid crowds, monitor local media for updates, and be aware of surroundings.

“The Embassy is monitoring reports that extremists have imminent plans to target large gatherings in Moscow, to include concerts, and U.S. citizens should be advised to avoid large gatherings over the next 48 hours,” the March 7 security alert said.

Putin addressed the warnings a couple weeks later, criticizing the warning three days ago as “provocative.”

“All this resembles outright blackmail and the intention to intimidate and destabilize our society,” Putin said, according to state media reporting on his remarks.

The US embassy issued another alert on Friday saying it was “aware” of the attack and urged Americans to avoid the area.

187 points

Hot damn. So I kind of understand why the Russians would dismiss this as a lie or a threat because yknow. War in Ukraine, Trump, etc, relations are bad to put it politely.

But can we talk about what kind of terrifying flex of power that is from US Intelligence? It’s one thing to predict a terror attack on your own soil- sure your citizens quite rightfully won’t like the privacy violations, but the national authorities are going to help you; so if your intelligence agency is worth the name it should stop most attacks.

But can you imagine having information access that’s so damn good you can not only predict a terror attack in a nation that has an extremely vested interest in not letting you know what they’re doing because they’re running a war that you (and everyone else) don’t like, but you feel completely confident TELLING THEM, which could risk your information sources if they’re not properly hidden. This is like the Foreign Intelligence equivalent of being so far ahead of your opponent in a game that you start giving them sincere advice on how to play so that they don’t get thrashed too badly.

permalink
report
reply
102 points

It reminds me a bit of the US intelligence saying that Russia was going to invade Ukraine and attempt to make it all the way to Kiev while Russia was adamant that it would never happen.

The other thing to note is that all countries have an “obligation to report” which requires them to report evidence of terror attacks to any county that would be the victim, even if they are a hostile nation. As much as “US bad” is true, it’s frankly refreshing to see us do the right thing so publicly, even if it was only as a way to make Putin look bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

US intelligence called the day and the hour the invasion would start, as well as the route the first military group would take. I remember at the time people were speculating that Russia would call it off or change plans because their operation had been so thoroughly blown, while a lot of global media was just accusing the US of warmongering. Russia just plowed ahead with their invasion anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It ended up being a good litmus test. The people who were being genuine admitted they were completely wrong, like Snowden. Others never said they were wrong in their doubts, and they’re generally grifters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

It wasn’t just Russia who was saying that wasn’t gonna happen, basically everyone outside the US thought it wouldn’t happen cause it would be a really stupid thing to do. Then it turned out they did it and it was really stupid and I think a lot of people were surprised the US was telling the truth and it wasn’t just fearmongering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Countries have an obligation to report

Are you kidding? Almost all terror attacks are one way or another sponsored by counties and governments who are all too happy to see another country suffer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Strategically, from the US perspective, it was an enormously effective flex. It doesn’t matter what Putin says to his people, or the world, but now he knows that the US knew, and could have said nothing. Charles de Gaulle once said, “No nation has friends, only interests.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Pretty sure Kissinger said that; the us does not have allies or enemies, only interests.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.
Lord Palmerston, House of Commons, 1 March 1848

People says Kissenger paraphrased this with “America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests” - afaik there’s no evidence of this but either way the quote’s older than he is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is true, but sometimes strategic interests actually does line up with the morally correct thing to do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I wish that was the rule and not the exception

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

America’s relationship with Russia is complicated. But they’re pretty motivated to see ISIS go down. Something like this is a big recruiting event.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

was looking at a lemmygrad post on this attack earlier.

They’re convinced that ISIS is a current CIA asset

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Everything they don’t like is caused by the CIA according to them. Apparently, the CIA has unlimited and omnipotent power… which is why it’s weird that they’re expecting a glorious revolution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What’s lemmygrad

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I’d wager they knew it was legit but didn’t care if, or even preferred, it happened. They’re playing a table top game with real lives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If they weren’t currently engaged in a war in Ukraine, this might be the case. Could get the country to rally around Putin as he goes on a big military campaign in Chechnya/Syria/Africa/wherever to get revenge against ISIS.

But Russia currently doesn’t have the military resources for this, so it just make Putin weak and incompetent for being unable to protect Russians from the terrorists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Exactly. When I read it I assumed it was a false flag attack. I mean, Putin doesn’t have the best track record when it comes to bombing his own people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

if they knew it was legit why didn’t they just say nothing? it’s weird Putin is on record saying it won’t happen, right before it happened. makes him look stupid.

tbh though I’d be surprised if they genuinely had no idea, how can their intelligence be so much worse in their own country?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Their own assets are probably busy in Ukraine or trying to combat Ukrainian infiltrators

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Moles. Moles EVERYWHERE.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Or listening devices everywhere…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This could escalate the situation a lot of Russia gets hell bent in blaming Ukraine or the US.

Even from an extremely cold perspective, there’s little strategical benefit for the US on this, and it’s a wild card.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

Or they helped plan it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Then told Putin the exact plan, knowing 100% that he wouldn’t act on the information? God damn, we’re fucking amazing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

Your president once gave Saddam Hussein the green light to invade Kuwait.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Okay, what’s your evidence? The public advance warning? Their long history of backing isis /s?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m not sure why you’re getting downvoted, I have been saying for years the weather man is causing the storms and they call me crazy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points

There’s a passage in the book ‘The Godfather’ that everyone should read and understand.

One of the most powerful Mafia families in New York rose to power because they were willing to kill people over garbage collection. All the businesses needed trash hauling, and nobody was crazy enough to risk their life to compete with murderers.

Putin wasn’t a genius who gained power through subtle moves; he was a shark who ate up anyone in his way.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

It’s just business, nothing personal.

At the end, …it’s all personal.

I swear nobody got that. People say that line and I’m like ‘Well, fuck you very much if you read the book’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Nobody read that book

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

deleted by creator

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

For being able to speak bullshit so fluently you think he’d be better at telling the difference, but the last couple of years have really proven otherwise.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Luckily, he could not care any less about the lives he destroys.

Russian or otherwise, they’re nothing but lambs to the slaughter to an unbridled sociopath.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Being a sociopath helps being an effective leader. And he has been an effective leader. Just that the outcomes that he wanted were unattainable by the sociopathic means he’s been using.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*

Highlights what a pathetic, weak little shit he truly is. Edit: it’s also telling how he assumes the warning was meant to destabilize russian society. What a scourge he has been on the world.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

It also points out that his own intelligence agencies don’t have the ability to gather information as well as the Americans, nor to properly assess information they get handed to them on a silver platter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah there may be consequences for doing a lot of purges in a country’s intelligence apparatus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Or if they’re like Israel, they do but the leadership rejects the warnings

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It draws many sharp contrasts with the West.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Putin is lucky that the attack happened after the election. I think he’d have only won about eighty-one percent of the popular vote.

permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 273K

    Comments