Fast-food chain Chick-fil-A has sparked a social media backlash after announcing that it will soon allow certain antibiotics in the chickens it raises, citing supply issues.

Chick-fil-A restaurants in the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico will transition “from chicken raised with No Antibiotics Ever (NAE) to chicken raised with No Antibiotics Important to Human Medicine (NAIHM), starting in the spring of 2024,” the company said in a statement posted on its website this week.

146 points

“In a statement to Reuters, Chick-fil-A said the policy change was due to challenges it foresees finding chicken supplies that “meets our rigid standards.””

So, clearly, the solution is “lower your standards”? 🤔

permalink
report
reply
45 points

If the other choice is make less money then it’s obvious what corporations will do

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

taking care of their chickens is not lowering their standards, its raising them

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I think that’s the trick though, they aren’t “their” chickens. They’re buying them from 3rd party vendors.

If they wanted to be serious about quality, they’d set their own standards and raise their own chickens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That god they don’t actually have to do that to have chicken standards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-39 points

I mean, lowering standards is a pretty common solution. A friend of mine who was a firefighter said they wanted more female firefighters - so they lowered test standards so they were able to pass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Not sure if you’re a sexist asshole or referring to tests that were originally made to be sexist/racist to only prefer a specific type of person, like the Jim Crow Literary tests that were purposely difficult and confusing to stop black folks from voting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

Evaluations for firefighters have physical requirements. It is a physical job, men and women do tend to have different biological characteristics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points
*

They were test to assure safety of human life, and women couldn’t pass them. So they lowered them. The biggest one was being able to carry a person of a specific mass out of an area within a specific amount of time, with all your gear on, in a smoke filled room. Few men were able to pass it, and almost no women. So they lowered the amount of weight and upped the time limit. Sometimes even just flubbed the women passing so they could reach diversity goals.

People will die because of it, but hey…women firefighters! WOO HOO!

Now the thing that’s really sexist, is denying sexual dimorphism exists within the human species and that men --in general-- can be better suited among the general populace for specific tasks when it comes to simple brute strength.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is completely off topic, but here’s some facts for you, from someone who works at a fire department.

Those physical fitness tests were pretty arbitrary. They don’t have much basis in the job itself.
At most departments, physical fitness tests are for the application only, and a LARGE percentage of current firefighters couldn’t pass them just a few years later.
There are many, many jobs a firefighter does, and most of them do not require massive amounts of physical strength.
Firefighters deal with the public, and often in a medical capacity far more often than an extinguishing fire capacity. Having female paramedics available to run medical calls is very important for the community. This is the same for having a mix of employees from all socioeconomic groups that are in the area.
There are a LOT of fire departments that are switching to a more fair entrance criteria, and that is making the job better, not worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

I know you’ve just kind of had a knee jerk reaction here, but I don’t think women should be restricted from that field ya know…I’m perfectly okay with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points
*

Chick-fil-A budget

Food $200

Data $150

Rent $800

Homophobia $3,600

Utility $150

someone who is good at the economy please help me budget this. my company is dying

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Stop spending so much on homophobia

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

If you could get them to ignore their “moral compass” you could save them $4,416

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

I don’t get the popularity of Chick-fil-A. Bland sandwiches and little variety.

permalink
report
reply
74 points

It has a conservative Christian cult following due to the founder’s political and religious views.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

They don’t give a shit about LGBT lives, but they sure do give a shit about antibiotics… I’ll give you a single guess as to why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Turns frogs gay?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-27 points

No it doesn’t. It’s just generally immensely popular.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

No, it’s both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

First off, remember it’s fast food, standards are abysmal.

But it’s an actual piece of chicken, that’s actually prepared correctly.

If you got it in a sit down restaurant or even pub, you wouldn’t comment on it.

But compare it to any other chicken sandwich you could get from a drive thru in the last 20 years and the hype makes sense.

No matter where you are, if you see a chicfila you know you’ll get a decent chicken sandwich that isn’t ridiculously expensive.

A burger place isn’t going to do chicken as well as a dedicated chicken place, and KFC is a joke, so the only real competition for that niche is Popeyes on a national level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I guess you can still call it good but they switched to Tyson on the East Coast like 10 years ago and yeah it’s bland and generic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

KFC in North America could learn a thing or two from KFC in China. It’s their McDonald’s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Twenty years ago? Probably?

Ten years ago? Doubtful

But the past few years have seen most of the fast food fried chicken places go hard on chicken sandwiches. And even mcdonald’s has stepped up their game to being actually pretty decent.

Mostly chikfila just coasts on their recognition from 20 years ago and the zealots who refuse to try anything else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Incidentally you can tell which universe a person is from by how they spell Chik-fil-a

You spell it the way it was spelled in my original universe

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Fast food also varies so much across the US. I talked up Chick-fil-A so much after having it in Texas, and then when I brought my girlfriend to one in Florida it was garbage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

in Florida it was garbage.

I’ve identified the issue…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Dave’s Hot Chicken would like a word with you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Well if there was one within a thousand miles of me Maybe it could

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s also pretty expensive

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Popeye’s is better. I’ve had Chick-fil-A once (bought for me) and it was exactly what it looked like: a chicken sandwich. It was a bit bland and watery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Let me guess, someone bought it for you, let it sit in a bag for an hour, and then gave it to you…and you judge the entire franchise off this one experience

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

One thing I do like is that they have (the option of) whole grain buns… I’ve been unable to find that elsewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

If juicy=flavorful then sure, it’s flavorful. I look for more though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Right wing chicken chain has loyal right wing followers

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

May 2023 and first I heard of it. I think this one got no attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

To your edit, yes. This is Lemmy. Very strong echo chambers and if you don’t agree, you are wrong.

This place is getting worse by the day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is the only explanation that makes any sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Your forgot expensive too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Everything is expensive now

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You are right. I’m going to cry in a pillow now

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Seriously. It’s like being in love with average quality.

In my city, the dive bar makes better chicken sandwiches. How depressing that people live like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

In my city, the dive bars make phenomenal chicken sandwiches, which cost 4-5 times as much as Chick fil A, who makes a good chicken sandwich.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I prefer “Dave’s Hot Chicken”. Large boobs, and lots of spice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The peach milkshake slaps but the food sucks. Popeyes is better for God’s sake.

Of course I stopped going entirely after they said they stopped donating to LGBTQA+ groups and then got fucking caught doing it yet again so yeah fuck Hate Chicken

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, I mean, their stuff is okay but pretty unexciting IMHO. They might be inexpensive, kinda the Taco Bell route.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Taco Bell isn’t that cheap anymore. I ate there not long ago for the first time in years and it was over 10$ for the basic taco combo, not even Supreme. And they sucked. They were almost completely devoid of fillings. They are on my eternal shit list now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’re not inexpensive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I think you’re just being contrarian.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not here. Here that’s the “normal” side, eating the homophobia jesus chicken is the minority.

Of course, all of the lgbt people I know eat also there, so I don’t feel the need to be performative about it, my friends won’t deride me for going they’ll ask for de-ride there.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Their fries didn’t even have salt when I tried them

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

It’s because the jesus is fresh with every meal, christian’s really eat that shit up

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

It is pretty much the pinnacle of “white people fried chicken”. American KFC (because Asian KFC is godlike) comes close but so many people never grew up beyond eating chicken tenders and bones scare them.

So you have inadequately seasoned chicken tenders soaked in pickle juice and people lose their minds.

And the strong focus on Christian Values, err, “Good service” means that nobody will ever be faced with the horror that is the realization that their satisfaction is not the only reason that someone is working in fast food.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Reliable/consistent, fast.

No one gives a shit about the politics of the company outside of the permanently online

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Fuck ChikFila and thier bigot sponsors.

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*

Absolutely fuck ChikFila I haven’t spent a dime at ChikFila since they started all the anti lgbt bullshit in the 2010s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I bought a sandwich for them when I read that they stopped doing all that stuff, of course they quitely started up again.

You really aren’t missing much. It is marginally better quality compared to any chain and lower quality than a real restaurant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Just tell your customers you upped the Jesus in every sandwich and they’ll overlook everything else.

permalink
report
reply
-7 points

reddit comment

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 521K

    Comments