In Kansas, some critics questioned whether the measure would violate free speech and press rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment…
But critics of the bill, mostly Democrats, argued that the law could be interpreted broadly enough that LGBTQ+ teenagers could not access information about sexual orientation or gender identity because the legal definition of sexual conduct includes acts of “homosexuality.”
shakes grave of John Brown come back bud, we need you in Kansas again
is this driver’s license shit or will the kids just click “yes i’m over 18” like they always have?
I couldn’t find the text of the bill, but from a different story: "The bill would not require a specific method of age verification, only outlining that sites could use any “commercially reasonable method” approved by the Kansas attorney general.”
And if you haven’t heard of our piece of shit AG: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kris_Kobach “As Secretary of State of Kansas, Kobach implemented some of the strictest voter identification laws in the history of the United States and fought to remove nearly 20,000 registered voters from the state’s voter rolls.”
lol he can get in the woodchipper along with the people voting for it, but that’s probably just gonna be a button like all the porn sites.
I forgot Kobach won the AG election
Absolute clown that managed to try (and fail) at attesting that there is widespread voter fraud, then got pantsed by a Dem in the gubernatorial
Have you ever wanted to just be able to beat someone to death with your bare fists?
In minecraft of course.
And I’m sure their age of consent is like 10. But that’s for straight people.
But critics of the bill, mostly Democrats, argued that the law could be interpreted broadly enough that LGBTQ+ teenagers could not access information about sexual orientation or gender identity because the legal definition of sexual conduct includes acts of “homosexuality.”
Are Kansas Democrats really this stupid, or is it part of the good cop/bad cop act? Isn’t that the entire point of this bill?
The stupidity is for pretending that it’s a side effect instead of the purpose.
I think that could just be the phrasing of the article, most of the local activists I follow are saying its that straight up
