-194 points

I privatized my predatory government loan and am getting no handouts because I made the fiscally responsible decision. Only irresponsible people get relief. How fair is that?

permalink
report
reply
88 points

People who got taken advantage of with no resources to help themselves are getting help, that’s a good thing. I’m not getting anything out of it, but someone else is, and my upper lip is stiff. Maybe you should consider that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Yeah but if it doesn’t help me then it’s bullshit and is a waste of time. Why is the main focus of government and society not to make my singular life better? It’s bullshit.

/s obviously lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Did you read the article? This was only for income driven plans on a path to forgiveness. If you had that and refinanced anyway, that’s on you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
157 points

My grandfather died from polio before the vaccine was created, how fair is that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-48 points

Not a fair comparison at all. Polio can’t resurrect the dead and fix its past mistakes. The government can. I paid the predatory rate for years before getting smart about it. It kept me from generating wealth and drove me deeper into debt due to the lack of free cash flow. The government made its money back on my loan and was just profiting off of me for years to come. Not a fair system. When they said the loans would turn on again the first time, I pulled the trigger on a lower interest private loan. The damage was already done though. They owe me a check if everyone else gets money wiped away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Well maybe you weren’t as smart as you think you were. Seems like the smart play would have been a defer all those payments until right now. That’s what the smart people are doing.

You made your own mistakes deal with them

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The government can resurrect the dead?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That’s not what the plan was though. Last time I checked it would even help those who paid everything off. I’m wondering which news sources you follow to not have noticed that bit.

Also, having policies that make millions of people suffer, what effect might it have on living conditions of everyone? If a few make a bad decision it is on them, if millions made a bad decision it’ll be a problem for society. It could be ignored, but it’ll still effect society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

WHAT ABOUT MY LEG!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s like rain on your wedding day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Trust me bro, it’s not like we’re all over here getting handouts and eating ice cream. 99% of us haven’t gotten shit.

The government bails out companies and banks all the time for their poor fiscal choices and no one even blinks. But if they bail out something not a corporation and roughly middle class looking, then it causes an uproar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points
*

“Waah waah, nobody was nice to meeeee, so fuck everyone ELSE, because I’M an adult!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

You made a stupid decision and you’re paying for it. What do you want, some free socialism? Would you be here bitching if your gambit paid off? If you’ve got a hard on for the private sector you could have stolen some free tax dollars with a PPP loan like the other Republicans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

predatory government loan

privatized … fiscally responsible

Man, I know things are über fucked in the US, but WTF is this nonsense?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

People agree to take out loans in order to boost their education level and income later. However, these aren’t like a normal loan, where there is a physical asset securing the loan, so to make them work they cannot be discharged via bankruptcy. Some people find this idea predatory. However, it’s a core part of what makes them work at all. Otherwise, one could load up on the student loans, get their degree, declare bankruptcy, then go out into the job market with the boosted income and not pay back what they borrowed.

During periods of very low interest, it can also be fiscally responsible to replace the loans with fixed-rate lower interest ones. During covid, this was pretty popular since interest rates were rock bottom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes. The 8% interest rate on them was brutal as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

the us is just fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

It’s the truth. I went from a nearly 8% interest government loan that was presented to me as a normal thing to do and something that I would be able to afford with a good job to a 3% private loan. I should have done it years earlier, but didn’t really know any better until the government took much more money than the loan was worth. The system is fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

People with no risk tolerance crying when risk pays off, the finest of wines to my risk tolerant palate 🤌

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If we halt progress whenever it comes too late to help everyone, we’ll never have progress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I think privatizing your loans was the irresponsible decision lol. Why in the world would you give up gov loan protections even if the average interest rate is a bit lower

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Life isn’t fair.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Ask all the people who privatized their ppp “loans.”

Life isn’t always fair, but relief for other people is still good. I’ve never taken a loan. None of kids did. We all paid out of pocket. I still support this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

So you’re saying you’ve already gotten your relief, then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I took a very different track with mine. I recognized that federal loans had more options for hard times than private loans and made the fiscally responsible decision to not refinance mine with a private company. So only people who were responsible enough to consider that the government is more likely to protect you than a for-profit money grabbing predatory private loan servicer are getting relief.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Ah, yes, everyone remember the golden rule: “Got mine, so fuck literally every other human being in a worse situation.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Being a good little cog in a bad system isn’t something you should be congratulating yourself about.

Debt systems are extractive and produce little net benefit to society, propping them up to expand the suffering because you didnt get sick or hit by a car or whatever is some peanut brained anti-human shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Maybe this says something about the state of higher education….

permalink
report
reply
79 points
*

Thank God the actual fucking backbone of this country (the educated) are finally getting a (tiny by comparison) hand out instead of just corrupt, slimy ass corporations (for once).

permalink
report
reply
5 points

To be perfectly fair like most lower middle class kids are pushed into college by their parents. Rich kids don’t have much debt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-41 points

still not sure why the executive branch thinks it can make fiscal policy decisions, that’s the responsibility of the legislative branch

permalink
report
reply
47 points
*

If the legislative has delegated the execution of certain fiscal policy to the executive, and given the executive certain bounds within which it can operate on that fiscal policy, then the executive is within its prerogative to do so.

The legislative branch has been abdicating power to the executive for some time due to its own consistent deadlock. I don’t think that’s a good thing, but it does mean the executive often ends up with some limited purse string control.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

if it has… has it? news to me

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Yes, that’s in the text is the heroes act that the supreme court failed to read properly and wrote their dumb ass majority decision about.

I’d recommend reading about the majority decision and the dissent from Kagen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-49 points

he could just wipe it out, but yaknow, he’d rather do what his big donors want. instead he throws a bone just to try to win votes.

permalink
report
reply
59 points

The supreme court blocked Biden’s attempt at loan forgiveness two weeks ago

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, they blocked his weak sauce attempt to forgive some of the debt, with a heavy dose of means testing to not forgive too much.

Biden has full authority through the 1965 Higher Education Act to wipe out all the student loan debt entirely. He could do that today. Of course he chooses not to / pretends he isn’t aware of this. What do you expect from Biden, who single-handedly brokered the deal in the 90s to make it impossible to declare bankruptcy due to student loan debt?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Correct. Republicans just do whatever the fuck they want, law be damned.

The democrats always pussy-foot and are like “we tried the bare minimum and it didn’t work, sorry! 🏳️‍🌈”

I want just one democrat who tries some of the fuckshit that republicans do all the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

I assume you’ve been living under a rock?.. Biden tried to unilaterally wipe out a ton of student loans and it was blocked by a court ruling.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He really could. Move all funding for record up keep to other departments. After a period of time the data would be so broken that lawyers could make the argument that the debt can no longer be serviced since no one knows what is owned.

Biden is definitely an institutionalist so he would never go about it that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 523K

    Comments