I’m looking to set up a machine for my stepdad to record and edit music on. Audacity is the first choice that comes to mind, but I’m wondering if there are better/more fitting to usecase options out there.

12 points

Ardour. Fun fact, it’s primarily developed by Paul Davis who was one of like two other people in the garage with Bezos working on building Amazon at the start. He took that windfall and just used it to retire and work on FOSS passion projects the rest of his life.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

For a recording computer, the very first thing you’re going to want is a low-latency audio interface you can plug microphones into. These don’t have to be terribly expensive, but you don’t want to go too cheap. My favorite bang-for-the-buck interfaces are the Behringer UMC204HD or UMC22, but if you think you might need technical support better go with something like a Focusrite Scarlett.

Then, you need software that can use the low-latency ASIO drivers for the interface, which Audacity can’t unless you build it yourself from source code. The reason you want low latency is that it lets you listen to what you’re recording actually sounds like as you’re recording it, without a distracting delay between the sound in the real world and the sound in your headphones.

So, you need a DAW. Ardour is open source but it isn’t free on Windows; Reaper is a better choice, even though it isn’t open source. No DAW at any price is better than Reaper for tracking live instruments. It’s widely used in professional contexts. It’s also wicked fast, and the tutorial videos on YouTube are fantastic (Reaper Mania channel) and well-organized in practical use cases.

The main “drawback” with Reaper is that its built-in mixing effects prioritize functionality and power over appearance; you kinda have to know what each slider and knob is supposed to do (or look it up), and there aren’t a ton of presets to fall back on, even though everything you need is actually in there. It also doesn’t come with loop packs or software instruments like digital synths or sampled pianos etc. like more expensive DAWs do. But resist the urge to solve these “drawbacks” with money - there are tons of free and/or open source plugins and software instruments out there for the searching - look at Decent Sampler / Pianobook and Spitfire Labs for instruments, ReaPack for community-built Reaper extensions (especially the Tukan stuff), Kilohearts and Melda for excellent free utility plugin bundles (that duplicate things Reaper can already do, for the most part, but with friendlier interfaces).

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Seconding Reaper. It’s leaps and bounds ahead of Ardour and the Linux version of Reaper is more stable than Ardour in my experience. Even though it’s not open source, it’s essentially an indie project and it’s extremely well made. I hope that it will be open sourced when the guy retires.

permalink
report
parent
reply

He’s already got an interface, so that step is out of the way. A lot of people in these comments recommend reaper, so I’m thinking of going with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Literally just pirate virtual instruments. Most of the best ones are cracked.

If you ever make lots of money you can buy a license later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

You want Reaper over audacity. (Even though iirc it is proprietary).

There is a FOSS true DAW on Linux I tried once. It was decent on its own, but plugin support was ass.

permalink
report
reply

Audacity is an excellent recording program.

Hydrogen is an excellent drum machine.

There is a free software DAW named Ardour which seems pretty complex, but I don’t do enough audio production to compare it against commercial alternatives.

LMMS is also pretty cool.

Then there’s always MilkyTracker if you want to go medieval.

IMO, where FOSS audio production shines is not in any specific DAW software, but in the capabilities offered by toolkits like Jack and PipeWire to take audio and MIDI outputs of any program and plug them into the inputs of any other program. The ability to run commercial VST plugins in WINE is a bonus.

There are dozens of arbitrary synthesizers and sequencers out there, all with unique perks and rough edges. But there is strong infrastructure to create a pipeline from all of these individual components. You are required to fuck around with it.

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*

Audacity is the actually FOSS answer, afaik. I’ve used it a lot, but not for music (much). It’s not a DAW, but if it’s just recording and stitching tracks together it will 100% work, and with some effort you can do fancier stuff.

There’s also Ardour and Zrythm which are more real DAWs Ithink? but I know nothing about them. Maybe try ardour if you already know you don’t want to do audacity

permalink
report
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.2K

    Posts

  • 48K

    Comments