Microsoft (MSFT.O) will sell its chat and video app Teams separately from its Office product globally, the U.S. tech giant said on Monday, six months after it unbundled the two products in Europe in a bid to avert a possible EU antitrust fine.

95 points

That will just make them more money as they can charge whatever they want for both

permalink
report
reply
71 points

From Teams plus office 10 euros a month per user to Office alone 9 euros a month per user and Teams alone 5 euros a month per user.

Microsoft would never do that now, would they ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Never!!! 🤪

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points
*

Capitalism has a lot of problems, but the freedom given to a seller to set their prices to whatever they like and watch the buyer decide it is not a fair price and go buy from someone else is not one of them.

This is a win for everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Are you familiar with the concept of a captive market?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Its only freedom if there’s actual choice involved.

The scale at which these sales are made has nothing to do with the average consumer. Its just mega corps crunching numbers.

And that really only has to do with share prices, none of it trickles down to the actual workers.

This is just rich people having slap fights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

this is all well and good when we’re talking about a properly elastic market (eg food)

however, the supply of hosted enterprise video conference software is extremely limited (teams, zoom, google meet) and the demand is extremely high

moreover, switching providers and reeducating the staff will also be highly expensive

you can’t exactly go anywhere else, you just have to agree to whatever msft is doing

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The problem with that is when a company like Microsoft has used and abused its position for such a long time that the only possible competition is another megacorp. No real choice there, only an illusion of choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

If we clearly have to pay for.something, instead of it being wrapped into a license of so many things, I will push for us to take Zoom.

It just works better.

Annotating on screen is worth it alone, instead of trying to talk the screen sharer to what part of the screen you want to talk about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I want:

  • Zoom’s…
    • …annotation
    • …richer reactions
  • Teams’s…
    • sensible screen layout
    • richer chat content
    • chat continuity before/during/after meetings
    • very granularly customizable avatars
  • Some other tool’s composition interface for chat text
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The annotation is a killer feature I don’t why others haven’t added it yet

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Pretty sure the only reason any org uses teams is because it’s already bundled for free with office or Enterprise subscriptions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Agreed

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Teams also have great integration with SharePoint which simplified administration and usage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m completely biases because I cannot find a si gle redeemable feature of SharePoint… Hence, anything that integrates with SharePoint is just worse by doing so

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

…now that the marketplace has been altered.

Zoom was disruptive in the market because the other options SUCKED - Skype, GotomyPC, WebEx, etc all did a lot of rapid maturing during the pandemic to catch up to Zoom, and this ‘bundling’ of Teams with Office has built user lock-in via Office 365.

Well played Microsoft, once again ducking a well deserved anti-trust suit. ‘Historic injury’ should count equally as ‘current injury’ for prosecution, arguably especially so if that historic injury is what created your current market share

permalink
report
reply
50 points
*

THEY ARE UNBUNDLING PRODUCTS?!!? WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS, APRIL FOOLS DAY?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

the two ways to increase profitability: bundling and unbundling

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Maybe businesses will stop forcing “free” Teams on their workforces now. What a pile of shit.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

I fucking hate teams, I swear every single day it iritatea me, and at least once a week I find something new I hate about it. This week, it keeps pinning my self-chat. Which I don’t use. If it lets me unpin it, it’ll end up pinned again within a couple of days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It is a huge source of frustration for me at work as well. It is slow, it has too many weird and ill-defined features shoved in, it is difficult to search, the WYSIWIG markdown features are fuckulated, it crashes regularly, there is too much wasted/negative space in the UI, and worst of all, it makes me sad in my heart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

What’s a better alternative? I was a big fan of Teams back when I worked with an org that used it

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

How? It can’t even handle copy/pasting text without fucking up the formatting.

Creating new SharePoint sites whenever you start a chat so that you have a whole new way to lose your documents?

Better alternative? Pretty much any other chat app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Slack and Mattermost

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Slack is my modern go-to, but I still also use IRC. Slack has great support for technical chat, doesn’t slow my i7 with 32GB RAM to a crawl, has great multiple account support and even voice chat if you are into that. I prefer zoom for video when I need it, but slack’s isn’t nearly as shit as teams.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Honestly? Even Discord, a game chat app. Teams just sucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Or matrix. Matrix is great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

They’ll still be rolled up in an E3 license so corporations won’t really notice the difference

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Would you happen to have a source that you could link on that please? I’ve been trying to see if it affects us since I read the Ars Technica story this morning. We have been getting Teams historically with the Office 365 E3 license that comes with our Action Pack sub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Oh, it wasn’t a verified response, just one of those “well this is most likely how Microsoft will deal with it” things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I suspect you’re correct, but I’d like to see it in black and white. I wear a number of hats and one of them makes me answerable to questions like “Why has my Teams stopped working?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If this works like how they did it here in Europe, where this change happened last year, then this won’t affect existing tenants, other than also getting a standalone teams sku available.

On new tenants created after the change took effect however, there will be no sku with teams bundled available, only the standalone teams sku and teams less E3/E5 skus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That makes sense. Thank you for replying. 👍

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments