5 points
*

LNG by sea is not really better than coal in terms of emissions and pollution.

It’s absolutely awful. Biden was 100% right to put the kibosh on it. It’s blood money to sell it and we know it. We’re no better than Russia or Saudi Arabia if we rely on this money.

Nope. I consider this the same as refusing to give aid to Ukraine. It’s a non-starter. We do not sell off the future of our planet just to satisfy some GOP donors’ greed and idiocy in order to buy protection for an ally that deserves it without contingency.

The worst part is, he knows Biden is all Mr. Consensus and Compromise all day every day. He’ll consider and maybe even agree to these terms. Which will basically be handing the next election to the Republicans if he does it, who will then promptly cut off all further Ukraine aid anyway.

There’s no situation outlined here where GOP decisions do not lead to the annihilation of an ally democracy. What they want is for there to not be a Ukraine.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

What a fascist fuck. He doesn’t want to give aid to a democracy being invaded by his fascist friend. So he add riders that are bs.

permalink
report
reply
29 points
*

Let’s be clear: Johnson DGAF about Ukraine. Otherwise, it’d be a clean bill without additional, non-related demands.

He and other Republicans have argued that by prohibiting American exports of domestic energy, the administration has in effect increased reliance on Russian gas and indirectly funded President Vladimir V. Putin’s offensive against Ukraine.

Ok, so he’s trying to make it sound related (while also blaming Biden 🙄). Still, I’m gonna need a citation on that, Mr. Johnson (R, LA).

He cited the case of Calcasieu Pass 2, the proposed export terminal in Louisiana.

Ah, there’s the pork.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Soooo-eeeee!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.8K

    Posts

  • 31K

    Comments

Community moderators