44 points
*

It’s the classic Trump recipe.
How do you make 4 million?
By starting with 58!

permalink
report
reply
40 points

Why would the Democrats do this?

permalink
report
reply
13 points

It must be those meddling radical left… Wall st brokers? Who even knows what the jackhole will cry next

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*

lol I got banned from /r/wallstreetbets today for pointing out this grift\meme stock and a mod got angry about it, temp banned, I appealed after he accused me of being political, which I wasn’t, I just mentioned that Trump is a grifter and this is just another example. He then muted me from appealing again, then banned me permanently.

I imagine he was a Trump supporter. :D Fuck Reddit.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Reddit mods are such immature people who shouldn’t have any power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s they type of personality it takes to mod for free. Good job u/spez! Great idea!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There are dickweed mods on here too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

‘If’ Trump plans to sell the stock, of course be plans to, he doesn’t care about it long term for potential real money. Also it’s the only reason it’s going public so he can cash out. He can buy more ways to whine his festivus grievances if he has real cash when it goes under.

Is there any way to know if Trump has actually sold his stock? Unsure how that stuff is reported but I sort of assume there’re records of who (or what shell companies) own them.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

I believe he is locked in on something along the lines of a 6 month cliff. This doesn’t mean he can’t use those rights/ options as leverage however. There might be some extremely questionable state actors for whom a couple billion in leverage against a US president is considered buying at a discount.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I thought the 6months was unless the board allowed it, the board that is mostly (all?) staffed by cronies that are there for that sort of thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Cronies yes, but it’s my understanding (and the understanding of several journalists) that letting Trump sell his stock would be such a wildly disastrous move for them financially that it’s unlikely. Like - they would be better off just donating the money to him themselves

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Insider transactions are subject to public filing laws. The fly in the ointment is how reliably Trump is subject to law enforcement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I keep wondering why Spez was allowed to sell the same week that the Reddit IPO went live, but Trump can’t do the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Wall Street must want to own reddit more than it wants to own shares of “DJT”; spez got a better deal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think those were put up as part of the initial offering. I think he’s limited on any additional sells.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Got to be honest; I figured that various unnamed billionaires would gobble the stock up in order to keep Donnie afloat.

Apparently, those “masked evildoers” are feeling the pinch.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 386K

    Comments