In a sharp escalation of its drone campaign targeting strategic industries deep inside Russia, Ukraine seems to have fitted Cessna-style light planes with remote controls, packed them with explosives and flown at least one of them more than 600 miles to strike a Russian factory in Yelabuga, 550 miles east of Moscow.

Ironically, the Russian factory produces—you guessed it—drones.

Russians on the ground recorded the shocking scene as the light plane dove onto the sprawling Alabuga Special Economic Zone industrial campus, where workers assemble Iranian-designed Shahed drones that, just like Ukraine’s DIY Cessna-style drone, can range as far 600 miles with an explosive payload.

151 points

Superior Ukrainian gen 5 stealth technology: The Cessna 206.

permalink
report
reply
77 points

I’m just imagining a Cessna wearing a giant pair of Groucho Marx glasses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
152 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

You’re amazing and I love you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Thats a decent ass edit

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Now this is Marxism I can get behind.

:: wiggles cigar ::

Whether or not he’d let me stand back there is another story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Next generation stealth plane: going back to basics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Damn, thought this was Non Credible Defense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And that’s how it’s done, people!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is great. Thank you for making my night

permalink
report
parent
reply
130 points

Let’s be honest…. Probably less expensive and just as effective as a tomohawk.

permalink
report
reply
125 points

A Tomahawk goes about 4 times faster, but it seems it doesn’t matter if your enemy is incompetent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points
*

Your comment made me go do the math and a TCM is, in fact, between 3.5 and 4 times faster than the fuel efficiency speed of a Cessna 206.

Kudos to you good Person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

And kudos to you for reporting that, so we all learn something new.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

No, a Tomahawk is really only a little faster than a Cessna

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Surely the speed of the tomahawk depends on how hard you throw it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

You mean an Indigenous Peoples Hatchet Missle?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yes, although I believe they are incompatible with the First Nations Attack Helicopter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

It shouldn’t be, though. The Russian military should have shot it down long before it got to the target.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
18 points

What a wild and spotted life that guy lives

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Perhaps? I worry about this tactic being used in the US against targets. For all anyone knows, they’re a plane that just lost communication.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I mean, that kinda already happened

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

But in that case fighter jets here are usually scrambled and if they don’t see anyone in the cockpit, they shoot the damn thing down

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This concept was in season 2 of Slow Horses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Used by whom? An actual military will need more than a handful of light aircraft to topple the USA and domestic terrorists just use semi-automatic firearms because they’re quicker, cheaper, easier and lower risk.

Rigging up a plane to be flown remotely is a non-trivial amount of specialised work and you still need to know how to fly a plane when you’re done.

Crashing it into something without an explosive payload has been done and it killed 2 people, one of whom was the guy in the plane. They’ll never win the approval of their far-right Discord buddies with numbers like that.

Filling it with explosives isn’t easy either since they don’t have a death cult that insists anyone should be able to buy them for any reason. Start buying up enough to take down a building and you’ll have feds knocking on your door in days (if you don’t accidentally blow yourself up first).

There are far more dangerous things to worry about than an imaginary plane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Who said they lost communication.

The Ukrainians installed a whole remote piloting system, it does not seem too difficult to control the radio remotely too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Maybe that one reason they took a cessna less suspect so less chance to get shot down ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Original plans called for a Boeing, but Ukraine knows better than the FAA.

permalink
report
parent
reply

As another commenter said

A Tomahawk goes about 4 times faster, but it seems it doesn’t matter if your enemy is incompetent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

This is the equivalent of wrapping ping pong balls in tin foil, putting a lighter underneath for a few seconds, and suddenly effective smoke bombs.

Edit: Yes, you can try this at home. But outside and obviously don’t rip the fumes like a bong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

You forgot the part where the smoke bombs were able to travel a vast distance undetected after you threw them at a low speed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I feel like that’s easy enough to fix with flint and some kindling/match heads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
95 points

This is pretty embarrassing for Russian air defense. Though, I also wonder if they were hesitant to shoot down an unidentified aircraft after multiple cases of friendly fire bringing down VKS aircraft. I’m also amazed that there was seemingly no Electronic Warfare (EW) systems in the area to prevent remote control of drones. Sure, there are EW countermeasures, but this seems like a pretty significant failure that this drone could be flown in from that far away.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Having a massive landmass has been a huge boon to Russia historically, but we’re seeing the inverse now with all these long range precision guided munitions. They have too much land to cover with adequate air defense, it seems

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

maybe it wasn’t remote controlled as much as pre-programmed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Seems probable yes. Although it would still require GPS to keep its heading which can be jammed

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Commercial aircraft have IMUs that carefully measure acceleration to get its position, IMUs are more accurate and reliable than GPS so GPS is the backup system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

They were busy jamming the European airspace

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I heard they can stop nukes. I don’t believe it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
7 points

While embarrassing, the environment in which that happened was entirely different. You had Regan and Gorbachev actively working to improve relations. And no one was actively trying to blow up Soviet infrastructure. You’d think the Russian air defenses would be a bit more sensitive to small aircraft coming from Ukraine in this environment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

permalink
report
reply
38 points

There were so many moments like that in this war. The grandma giving Russian soldiers sunflower seeds to put in their pockets so they grow when they die. The guy berating Russian soldiers saying “Every other woman here is a witch! All your dicks are going to fall off!” Zelensky saying “I don’t need a ride I need ammunition.”

Though I don’t know what else I’d expect from people who told the Ottoman Empire to go fuck itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

Absolutely badass. Slava Ukraini!

permalink
report
reply

please go meet bandera

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 272K

    Comments