I have been thinking about self-hosting my personal photos on my linux server. After the recent backdoor was detected I’m more hesitant to do so especially because i’m no security expert and don’t have the time and knowledge to audit my server. All I’ve done so far is disabling password logins and changing the ssh port. I’m wondering if there are more backdoors and if new ones are made I can’t respond in time. Appreciate your thoughts on this for an ordinary user.

12 points

Good question. I have asking myself the same thing as well. In case of ssh it is possible to use 2FA with a security key, which is something I’d like to put in my todo.txt

permalink
report
reply
19 points

you don’t and will never will. I would recommend reading a lecture by Ken Thompson the co-creator of Unix for more details on this https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~rdriley/487/papers/Thompson_1984_ReflectionsonTrustingTrust.pdf

permalink
report
reply
54 points

Self hosting personal photos doesn’t generally require opening anything up to the internet, so most backdoors would not be accessible by anyone but you.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Or someone who has penetrated your network.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Of which the chances are slim to none for 99% of people simply because they aren’t interesting enough to be a target beyond phishing, scans, and broad attacks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

We don’t know. However, no one cares about your personal photos ; no one will ever attempt to hack you specifically unless you’re a high value target (in which case, stop hosting your photos anywhere immediately)

The only thing that could get your photos is if an undiscovered backdoor is exploited by someone doing some sort of a mass attack. As far as I know, they’re pretty rare, because people with the means to do them generally have a specific set of people they care about (which you are unlikely to be a part of).

permalink
report
reply
13 points

We don’t know. However, no one cares about your personal photos ; no one will ever attempt to hack you specifically unless you’re a high value target (in which case, stop hosting your photos anywhere immediately)

To those assumptions I would say : we don’t know. Personal vendettas do exist and we cannot look into the minds of individuals going crazy neither.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That fair enough I guess, really depends on what kinda personal photos you have. I know people are worried about revenge porn, I personally think the only actual remedy is not having any porn of yourself anywhere unless it’s your job 🤷🏻‍♀️

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

unfortunately, mass attacks happen all the time. if you ever had access to the authentication logs of an SSH server with an unfirewalled port 22 into the internet that has been running for a few months, you would see international IPs starting port scans and brute force attacks. there is always someone out there trying to hack random IPs. it’s fucking wild west out there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah. I’d recommend using ssh keys and disabling password authentication whenever something is exposed to a public network

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

no one will ever attempt to hack you

My brother in Christ, how do you think botnets get built?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They did say specifically. I think bothers are usually automated attacks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

My ssh auth logs show a lot of login attempts from chinese IPs. That prompted me to install Fail2Ban…

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

We don’t know. But if there were well known backdoors to mainstream security practices we might see more companies that depend on security shutting down, or at least shutting down their online activities. Banks, stock trading, crypto exchanges, other enterprises that handle money, where hacking would be lucrative.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I don’t think you need to worry about backdoors with most of those. Worry more about unfixed security holes due to an extreme emphasis on “stability” as in using old versions when fixes have already been released when it comes to anything hosted by large companies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

There’s a concept of acceptable levels of risk. Companies are not going to shut down out of fear, or miss out on the business opportunities of online presence. There’s money to be made.

Even with things as serious as spectre allowing full dumping of CPU and RAM contents simply by loading a website, I can’t think of a single company that just said “well shit, better just die”.

Serious, potentially business ending, security issues usually have a huge amount of effort when discovered put into mitigations and fixes. Mitigations are usually enough in the immediate “oh shit” phase. Defense in depth is standard practice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There are several known instaces of crypto exchages getting hacked.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 9.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments