25 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


TOKYO, Aug 22 (Reuters) - Japan said on Tuesday it will start releasing more than 1 million metric tonnes of treated radioactive water from the wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant on Aug. 24, putting into motion a plan that has drawn strong criticism from China.

The plan, approved two years ago by the Japanese government as crucial to decommissioning the plant operated by Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) (9501.T), has also faced criticism from local fishing groups, who fear reputational damage and a threat to their livelihood.

“I promise that we will take on the entire responsibility of ensuring the fishing industry can continue to make their living, even if that will take decades,” Kishida said on Monday.

Foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said in July that Japan had shown selfishness and arrogance, and had not fully consulted the international community about the water release.

South Korean activists have also protested the plan, although Seoul has concluded from its own study that the water release meets international standards and said it respects the IAEA’s assessment.

The water was used to cool the fuel rods of Fukushima Daiichi after it melted down in an accident caused by a huge tsunami in 2011 that battered Japan’s eastern coast.


The original article contains 552 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 63%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*

Can someone with knowledge chime in to tell how bad that is? I don’t trust this article or China for that matter.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

The IAEA approved the release, so it’s unlikely to be catastrophic. I can’t imagine radioactive tritium is great for fish, but what do I know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It’ll dilute so quickly and thoroughly into the ocean that it might as well not be there. This is a classic case of the public panicking over the word “nuclear.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Nor is pissing in an Olympic pool, but at some point you’re at homeopathic levels and while it “sounds wrong” is actually totally fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

You don’t trust Reuters? Reuters is about as trustworthy and unbiased as you can get. They’re like the gold standard for non-editorialized journalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ve always heard it as Reuters is what the markets use to make their “bets” so has to be true enough to inform them.

permalink
report
parent
reply

China: bro… radioactive waste should not be dumped into the ocean, the fuck? Are you serious?

Me: 😡 stfu tankies

IEAE: it’s just radioactive tritium, how bad can it be? Surely the impact will be negligible

Me: ayyyy fuck them fishes 🤪🖕

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Tankie spotted, opinion discarded

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

China’s Hongyanhe power plant releases 4x as much radiation lol. It’s fake, unscientific concern being published for geopolitical reasons. I say this as someone who otherwise agrees with most of what the Chinese government has to say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

what sane reason would someone have to agree with literally anything that genocidal corrupt government would say

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points
*

Very very small amounts of radiation is not bad. Your body is exposed to this every day.

Japans plan is to dilute the “water” so much that it should be at safe levels while it decays. They’re also not going to release all of it at once, which might not be clear to some readers.

I believe their plan is widely recognized to be safe, but obviously there is a lot of fear around nuclear and radiation.

I believe the worry is that this amount has never Been released before, and that while we might consider it safe, there is a chance it accumulates somewhere to harmful levels.

And obvious consumers of fish are already reacting. Would you buy “safe” fish from Chernobyl if you could just as easily buy the same fish from South Korea?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Here’s the IAEA report: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/iaea_comprehensive_alps_report.pdf

The discharge limit for tritium is pre-defined in the Government Policy for discharges of ALPS treated water as 22 TBq per year, which is equivalent to the pre-accident discharge limits at FDNPS.

I’m also curious about how much discharge nuclear generators normally produce. If they discharge a certain amount as part of normal operation then it seems to me to also become a function of how many nuclear generators are being operated globally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

The Hongyanhe reactor annually releases 4x as many becquerels of tritium. The Fukushima metldown released 5,000x as much. So this is obviously a non-issue being drummed up due to politics. 🙄

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
1 point

Hasn’t got anything to do with this release. Clearly radiative material was received during the accident. That will have made it into the food chain and some fish living near plant will have absorbed some.

This release is about the gradual release of treated water which is measured to be below the existing limit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I don’t trust this article or China for that matter.

Then I guess it’s a good thing that this is Japan we are talking about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’m fairly confident they were referring to the criticism from China FTA, but you’d need to read past the headline for that context so…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Yes that was it. Chinas comments have been over the top for a bunch of issues in the past, there’s no reason to just presume their stance has merit.

Especially since they are starting fires again rn regarding Taiwan and Japan in different context.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Just put it in fancy bottles and people all over the world will buy it

permalink
report
reply
7 points

True story 😂 people buy weird stuff from gewenneth paltrow, surely she could marketing this to a succes!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

GLOWATER by GOOP. Or maybe H2GLO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Its probably relatively safe to drink lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Get a nuka-cola deal with Bethesda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
1 point

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/FAjrbtzr_NA

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Combo it with uranium glass bottles

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Just like that, it went from “Haha, what kind of idiot would buy that” to “OMG, I want a collectible 6-pack.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Do you want Godzilla? Because that is how you get Godzilla.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Yes. Yes I do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If 400 PBq of nuclear testing and 37,000 PBq of naturally occuring uranium in the ocean didn’t create Godzilla, then this obviously won’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

*Scoff*

This is not how you get Godzilla. This is how you get Hedorah… arguably much worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Jummy 😋☢️

permalink
report
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 9.9K

    Posts

  • 113K

    Comments