His ‘Sleepy Joe’ nickname for his rival seems to have come full circle, with social media users now calling Mr Trump ‘Sleepy Don’

While the rest of the world can’t peel their eyes away as Donald Trump’s historic criminal trial gets under way in New York, the former president himself appears to be far less enthralled by the proceedings.

Jury selection got under way on Monday in the first-ever criminal trial of a sitting or former president, as he faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a bid to cover up hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

But, according to some courtroom reporters, Mr Trump appeared to struggle to keep his eyes open – and at one point may have even fallen asleep.

“Trump appears to be sleeping. His head keeps dropping down and his mouth goes slack,” *New York Times *reporter Maggie Haberman reported.

The observation quickly inspired a new nickname for the 77-year-old former president: “Sleepy Don.”

-152 points

So…

In 2024 we have one candidate who can’t stay awake during his criminal trial…

And one candidate who isn’t facing criminal charges because of his age and memory issues…

Special counsel Robert Hur has declined to prosecute President Joe Biden for his handling of classified documents but said in a report released Thursday that Biden’s practices “present serious risks to national security” and added that part of the reason he wouldn’t charge Biden was that the president could portray himself as an “elderly man with a poor memory” who would be sympathetic to a jury.

“Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen,” the report said, but added that the evidence “does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/special-counsel-says-evidence-biden-willfully-retained-disclosed-class-rcna96666

Why do people keep acting like Biden and trump are in anyway capable of being president?

This could be the easiest election ever if Dems just ran someone who wasnt 20 years past retirement age.

permalink
report
reply
-5 points
*

I agree. The democratic party could nominate ANY candidate who has character, energy, and intelligence - and younger (to better represent Americans), and they’d likely win in a landslide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

[Citation Needed]

permalink
report
parent
reply
116 points

Both sides are not the same. Fuck off with this opinion

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points

No one said both were equally bad…

I said neither are good enough.

It’s pretty simple, but so is civility

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Mr. Biden said in February about the report that he was “especially pleased to see the senior special counsel make clear there’s stark differences between this case and Donald Trump.” But Mr. Biden later said that “there’s even a reference that I don’t remember when my son died. How in the hell dare he raise that? Frankly, when I was asked the question, I thought to myself it wasn’t any of their damn business.”

The transcript of Mr. Biden’s interview shows the president was unable to identify the precise year, but that he correctly named the month and date. “What month did Beau die? Oh God — May 30th,” Mr. Biden said in the exchange.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/special-counsel-robert-hur-testify-house-biden-documents-report/

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I always forget whether my mother died in 2003 or 2004. It was right before her birthday, so she died at an age that feels like it should be 2003, but it’s not. I’m 32. Am I too senile to run for president before I even qualify?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Innocent until proven guilty.

Love how much mob mentality has been on the rise since trumps election lmao. Who would’ve thought.

Pretty clear to everyone who the lesser of two evils is

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Pretty clear to everyone who the lesser of two evils is

No one said it wasn’t chief…

I said both candidates are bad. Not that they’re both equally bad.

If the most important thing is beating trump (and it is) why are we running a bad candidate against him instead of a good one?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He’s not a bad candidate. Could we do better? Always. Is that an option this year? No.

Stop trying to muddy the water to dissuade people from voting at all

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Maybe because the magnitude of your idiocy shook them out of their normal lane?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’ve made friends (as in IRL; we hike, shared classes, and go to conventions together) with multiple people who post their own lewds online for money and attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Reported as “stalking users/harrassment”, but I’m removing it because of misinformation. They do have other comments outside of porn communities.

p.s. Public comments are public comments. It’s not “stalking” to look at another users comment history.

The modlog is public as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Not sure why you would believe anything Robert Hur says since it was proven that he lied in that report.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-30 points

since it was proven that he lied in that report

I’m just going to finish reading that source you linked, I’ll reply back as soon as I’m done.

It’s weird tho, I’m having trouble clicking on it. Almost like it’s not there, but surely someone wouldn’t just insist it was true when it would be easy to prove it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I’m not going to waste my time since it’s clear you have no interest in anything that contradicts your biases. A simple search will give you what you need if you ever decide to wake the fuck up.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Shut up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Set crybots to maximum whinge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points
*

You’re missing that the special counsel saying this was extremely editorialized, unprofessional, and dubious at best. This is the counsel’s opinion without facts to back it up.

Whereas Trump falling asleep actually happened without editorializing. NYT is just reporting facts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

FAKE NEWS /s But they are not wrong why is the states voting for these geriatric presidents? There is no one else fit for the role or nobody wants it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Because both parties are owned by corporate interests and it’s not the voters who truly decide who gets on the ticket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Of course, the transcript of the interview that report is based off totally supports those allegations. Not politically motivated at all. No sir.

Sheesh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Well. I linked sources so you don’t have to take my word, you started your opinion in a condescending tone…

Do you understand the difference?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Young people are too smart to vote republican, old people are too dumb to vote for someone for someone younger than them. What you’re left with is Biden. He’s not ideal, but at least he isn’t Russia’s little bitch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

So what’s your excuse for 08 Obama being young and portraying himself as progressive resulting in not only winning, but flipping some red states for the first and last time in decades?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

C’mon! You’re not going to get a catchphrase like “yes we can” twice in one lifetime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

One side who is facing criminal charges for the laws he broke, and one who didn’t break the law.

Yeah, it’s clear who the fuckup is in this race, and it’s not even close.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


While the rest of the world can’t peel their eyes away as Donald Trump’s historic criminal trial gets under way in New York, the former president himself appears to be far less enthralled by the proceedings.

Jury selection got under way on Monday in the first-ever criminal trial of a sitting or former president, as he faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a bid to cover up hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

The former president’s apparent courtroom nap eventually began trending on X, with users flocking to the hashtag #DonSnorleone, a reference to the mafia kingpin Don Corleone from the Godfather series.

“I prefer Presidents who don’t fall asleep before the lunch break in their hush money paid to a porn star election interference trial,” one user mocked.

Mr Trump is charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records over so-called hush money payments made before the 2016 election to pay off adult film star Stormy Daniels in exchange for silence over an alleged affair.

The Trump campaign later vehemently denied rumours of the former president’s brief courtroom nap, saying in a statement: “This is 100% Fake News coming from ‘journalists’ who weren’t even in the court room.”


The original article contains 609 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Whatever distracts his base from the actual contents of the trial is a good thing for him.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

The trial hasn’t actually started yet, so it’s probably not a big deal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

trump because he has Low T

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Very likely does at that age with his lack of self care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Whatever he or the GOP says is projection. Anything.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

Accusaconfessaprojection

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 453K

    Comments