24 points

Not really, there are already “quantum proof” encryption algorithms that systems are already moving to.

It won’t be an apocalypse where all your personal data is suddenly available at the click of a button. You need to be a billionaire launching a new social network to get that level of privacy invasion.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

This breaks rule #1 as there is no question.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Meh. Various encryption has broken in the past and not made much difference publicly.

The only ones sitting on troves of ciphertext are government agencies who aren’t exactly going to disclose what they break when they do.

And for future applications, we’re already gradually moving over to quantum protected encryption standards.

At best, you’ll see a few pedophiles end up in jail in progressive nations and activists in jail in regressive ones, and a lot of bets being settled among people in three letter agencies about who was right about what was really going on at the time years ago, with perhaps a bit of new blackmail material for some folks still in positions of power.

It’s going to be way more anticlimactic than what even pre-quantum computing advances coming down the pipe are going to lead to in areas like ML.

TL;DR: With what’s coming along in the next few years, you’ll almost entirely forget about the more limited broken encryption effects that are going to largely remain secret anyways.

permalink
report
reply
4 points
4 points

What an interesting story!

For future readers, keep in mind that that is a work of fiction

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Soon whatever options we had for a little bit of privacy will be gone unless stronger encryption measures aren’t quickly created. And it’s not that simple either. Security is hard

permalink
report
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 9.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.9K

    Posts

  • 275K

    Comments