On the second day of the former president’s New York criminal trial, the defense argued against seating jurors who had posted negatively about him online

Donald Trump, a man renowned for craving adulation and approval, has this week been confronted with the disdain of Manhattanites called as prospective jurors in his New York criminal trial for allegedly falsifying business records to cover up a hush-money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels. No wonder he’s apparently trying to sleep through the proceedings.

While no jurors were selected on Monday — with dozens excused after indicating they could not be fair and impartial in weighing the 34 felony charges against Trump — seven made the cut on Tuesday. (The court will need 18 people to qualify in all: 12 jurors and six alternates.) However, more were dismissed after questions arose about content they had shared on social media that disparaged the former president, and Trump himself was not spared from hearing what they had posted.

One potential juror ruled out on Tuesday was a man who recently shared an AI-generated video of Trump saying “I’m dumb as fuck,” according to reporter Josh Kovensky of Talking Points Memo. The man had evidently tried to conceal his opinion of Trump during earlier questioning, per The New York Times, and protested that the video was only something he “reposted,” but Judge Juan Merchan dismissed him.

95 points

Just in case this ever comes up in court: DONALD TRUMP IS A PIECE OF SHIT. lol

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Let it be known in the Book of Ages that boydster stands with you in solidarity. Donald Trump is, in fact, a piece of shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I hope I’m not being too forward, but I’d like to throw my support in with you and c/Steve in saying Donald Trump is a total piece of shit. (If you’ll have me on the team.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Why would I say Donald Trump is a piece of shit? Alright, Donald Trump is a piece of shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

On the shit menu at my shit restaurant tonight:

Donald Trump (a total piece of shit)

Bon Apetit

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I would love if someone excused a juror due to a lemmy post.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

One potential juror ruled out on Tuesday was a man who recently shared an AI-generated video of Trump saying “I’m dumb as fuck,” according to reporter Josh Kovensky of Talking Points Memo.

That is like the least offensive criticism of Trump I’ve ever heard of. In fact, the most offensive part of it is what a waste of AI it is to make such a stupid video.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I was actually about to to comment about how that’s the only acceptable use for AI. It seems we’re at… loggerheads

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Have you seen the video of the AI generated Trump/Biden debate? Parts of that were hilarious.

You can also use it to write custom heartfelt notes for birthday messages for coworkers. And you can give it the ingredients in your kitchen and ask for a recipe that uses them up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

The notion that Trump might walk for his dozens of crimes because the sheer breadth of his infamy precludes a fair trial is some perverse irony.

permalink
report
reply
24 points
*

Not really how it works. The defense and prosecution do have an unlimited number of challenges to jurors who admit they can’t be impartial or can be proven to have such bias. They have a set number of challenges they don’t need to justify.

Even if you run out of jurors, the mistrial doesn’t trigger double jeopardy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

No it won’t indeed. It will just further delay the trial which is exactly what Trump wants. He either becomes president, maybe he’ll die, but as long as he can push this ahead of him, he’ll be fine

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

I would be so torn between my civic duty as a juror on this trial and being able to belittle him right to his face while he’s in earshot and has to listen.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

I fucking love this, mostly because he isn’t insulated by his “yes” men and gets to see what a real random sampling of people actually think about him.

permalink
report
reply
19 points
4 points

He’s trying hard not to cry. That’s a nice one. The walk of shame home from his no attendance rally is also great.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments