For example, could alternative terms like “carbon reducing” and “carbon increasing” make it more clear and avoid misinterpreting which means which?

34 points

Ngl I’ve never heard anyone ever refer to “carbon negative” as “carbon positive” in my entire life until today.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I’ve seen it, I think, on some brand of milk, where the advertising on their bottles said they planned to go “carbon positive” by some year. Unless they were just being intentionally sneaky in an attempt to sound good while promising to do nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Literally never heard “carbon positive” and I’ve been following this space since before some of you were born. Smells like some bullshit to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I don’t get where you think those terms are confusing.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Not OP, but I imagine “carbon negative” sounds negative because it has the word “negative” in it.

When it fact “carbon negative” means you’re reducing carbon, which is generally regarded as a positive thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“Negative feedback loop? That sounds bad!”

I agree it’s time for people to be able to comprehend words again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It sounds like OP has heard people say “carbon negative” to mean that something outputs more CO2 than it consumes, and vice versa, which is contrary to how I hear the terms used.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

“Our approach to carbon is negative for the planet”

Though I agree it’s not really used in this way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Carbon Capturing and Carbon Emitting?

permalink
report
reply
9 points

You’ve probably heard people use the term wrong.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

How about “positive carbon negativity” and “negative carbon positivity”? As a bonus, this allows us extra terms such as “negative carbon negativity” and “positive carbon positivity” which can be similarly confused for each other!

(On a more serious note, “carbon reducing” and “carbon increasing” are good.)

permalink
report
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.3K

    Posts

  • 297K

    Comments