35 points

I fucking love freedom and the free market 🦅🥲

permalink
report
reply
20 points

To be fair, this is denying government subsidies, which is more of a free market than giving subsidies. This is especially true for Chinese companies, since they are by definition state-owned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

This is US car companies using their paid off politicians to make the US pressure another country into not making a deal that would increase competition in that market to their detriment .That’s many layers of fuckery deeper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Is it that if they’re just blocking the vehicles that are subsidized? Let’s see what these EVs sell for without the Chinese government paying half the production costs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Everything you said is true, except you are missing the context that this is for-profit US car companies not wanting to compete against state-owned car manufacturers who get all of their money from China and can take huge losses in order to outsell for-profit, private entities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Except every other company gets subsidies, so this is specific and not “fait market”.

The current fair market for EV manufacturers includes getting a buttload of incentives from governments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There can be no market that is both “free” and “fair”

For a market to be fair there needs to be constraints in the right places

In this case the lack of constraints sufficiently restricting the ability for companies to pressure (read as bribe) politicians to push for a lack of subsides for specific sectors of an industry

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The key word there is “company.” Chinese car manufacturers are not companies, they are the state-owned entities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

These vehicles would also be eligible for those subsidies if they meet the criteria of being assembled from mostly North American parts. You’re comparing subsidies available for every company meeting certain criteria (even these Chinese companies) versus subsidies available only to those companies owned by the Chinese government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

At this point, with such low price points producing comparable quality, Chinese EVs don’t need international subsidies to be able to expand their manufacturing.

It’s still cheaper to buy imported Chinese EVs even with tariffs than to buy domestic EVs in most, if not all, countries.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

Why don’t other countries just lower their prices if they want to compete?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The Chinese government subsidizes their domestic car manufacturing industry to an insane degree. Regular capitalism can’t compete.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What are you talking about?

Capitalists love their subsidies. Just look at the semiconductor industry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Fuck the united states.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

and the subsidies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Chinese EV makers, or Chinese-made EVs?

One is perfectly fine, reasonable, and logical, while the other is stabbing yourself in the foot because your friend asked you to.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

China does not do altruism. Their car manufacturers are owned and subsidized by the government. They’re made to saturate and destroy markets with cheap goods, driving out the competition. Once there is no competition, they have the market to themselves and can manipulate as they see fit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Subsidized by the government like…

Tesla?

https://newrepublic.com/article/175397/teslas-cheaper-now-thanks-subsidies-musk-hated

https://qz.com/elon-musks-spacex-and-tesla-get-far-more-government-mon-1850332884

https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-list-government-subsidies-tesla-billions-spacex-solarcity-2021-12

https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hy-musk-subsidies-20150531-story.html

https://www.govtech.com/policy/gov-newsom-says-california-subsidies-powered-teslas-success

Oh, sorry, you must have meant a traditional car manufacturer like Ford.

https://www.cbtnews.com/ford-scores-massive-9-2-billion-loan-for-electric-vehicle-batteries/

https://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/news/ford-loses-billions-on-evs-despite-government-subsidies

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-13/ford-jobs-cost-414-000-apiece-as-fight-for-factories-takes-off

https://www.heritage.org/government-regulation/commentary/taxpayers-are-subsidizing-rich-electric-vehicle-owners-the-tune

https://www.autonews.com/manufacturing/ford-factory-subsidies-are-much-higher-other-deals

Oh, you meant other traditional car manufacturers like GM who took government loans to bail them out from bankruptcy.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/subsidies-supercharge-gms-ev-strategy-11668776501

https://www.energy.gov/articles/biden-harris-administration-announces-155-billion-support-strong-and-just-transition

https://www.mackinac.org/blog/2022/general-motors-should-not-get-soar-subsidies

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/19/bush-bails-out-us-automakers-dec-19-2008-1066932

https://www.marketplace.org/2018/11/13/what-did-america-buy-auto-bailout-and-was-it-worth-it/

Or maybe you meant non-American car manufacturers like Volkswagen?

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/volkswagen-subsidy-cost-canada-c24-bln-more-than-forecast-2023-06-14/

https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/germany-has-subsidised-total-two-million-electric-cars

https://industryeurope.com/sectors/transportation/germany-to-double-ev-subsidies-as-vw-launches-car/

They’re made to saturate and destroy markets with cheap goods, driving out the competition. Once there is no competition, they have the market to themselves and can manipulate as they see fit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

We shouldn’t allow the Chinese cars in. No way

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Why not?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

China does have a habit of market dumplings. It doesn’t play nice with trade. But no where does. China is just very good at flooding market with stuff that is artificially cheap. By say, not bothering to test it meets the regulations of the market. Or using slave trade. Or just straight subsidiaries.

Also all modern cars, EV or otherwise, and straight spy machines.

China is a problem, but cars isn’t where I’d start. (As long as they have been proved safe). I’d start with cheap electronics that don’t meet regulations all over Amazon and EBay. A lot is just environmentally bad as it’s just throwaway. Some is a fire risk.

China is just very good at dystopian capitalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think that’s regular capitalism. At least at far as everyone plays it.

The most popular Chinese EVs, the ones shipped internationally, are treated as rigorously as those if any other country and recently BYD specifically have begun receiving safety scores higher than cars from other countries.

Market dumplings? Haven’t heard that one before, what’s that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

China does not do altruism. Their car manufacturers are owned and subsidized by the government. They’re made to saturate and destroy markets with cheap goods, driving out the competition. Once there is no competition, they have the market to themselves and can manipulate as they see fit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Weird that you are confusing such discrete, almost antithetical concepts as altruism and capitalism.

Yes, Chinese auto companies are trying to corner part of the auto market like every other car company in every country does.

And now they’re doing it with inexpensive EVs receiving top marks in safety and manufacture, according to the top global standards.

So you can whine about all car companies trying to sell a product(seems like a waste of time) or provide actual evidence that the safety ratings for Chinese EVs are false in some way.

Right now you’re spewing irrelevant tangents that have nothing to do with the EV industry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

He doesn’t want them to compete with Americans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

A totalitarian government that allows slave labor, genocide and wants to invade Taiwan. Really?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think so. What are you asking, exactly?

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 287K

    Comments