12 points

House Speaker Johnson plans to package TikTok legislation with critical aid for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, and send it to the Senate. President Joe Biden vowed to sign it into law.

So it’s a rider with some important and time sensitive other things that need to pass. Headline is totally (and probably intentionally) misleading.

He could veto it, but it would cause actual harm because those funding bills would have to go back to Congress delaying much needed aid to Ukraine and Taiwan.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Biden has already indicated he in on-board with the TikTok ban so even if it wasn’t bundled in he would sign it. https://apnews.com/article/biden-tiktok-ban-house-china-aaa884d8c974f0a35856af5ee6aa4e99

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Biden has come out in favor of this bill already, the hold up is in the senate.

Even if it passes, I would expect TikTok to immediately sue and gain a temporary stay on enforcement. How it shakes out in court is not my area of expertise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

While also expanding their own surveillance capabilities, right?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Yeah, tiktok is a Chinese data mine so… they don’t want it to go away, they vwanna control it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Who downvoted this shit? This is 100% the case. The problem isn’t any of the negative effects of social media. The problem is that the US government doesn’t get to store and sort through all the data on TikTok like they do with US social media companies. They don’t give a shit about its effect on Americans. They just want the ability to use it against Americans like all the rest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
  • People: Why doesn’t the government ever pass a law that protects its citizens.

– Government: Here’s a law to protect our citizens from a foreign government spying on them.

– Gen Z: Noooooooooooooo!!!

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

Ah but that foreign government is cool and good! Gen Z knows that because the propoganda platform they’ve become addicted to tells them that China is cool and good, so clearly the U.S. is bad and being mean to the Chinese.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Also large chunks of this one, too. Theyre really trying to make this seem like its about stripping ur privacy. Like, theres literally another bill right now thats passing thats actually about stripping away ur rights to digital privacy, this one in particular has nothing to do with that. This one truly is, adversarial govts shouldnt get to spy on our citizens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I have literally never seen a single pro CCP tik tok. Been using it for several years daily. Not that they don’t exist, but if you’re not looking for them it certainly does not direct you to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

China told people lies about the bill and told them to call congress. They did call congress and complain citing the Chinese lies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Literally no downsides to getting rid of TikTok.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Literally no downsides to getting rid of TikTok.

Well, unless you want people under the age of 40 to vote for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The law isn’t specifically for TikTok. Its to allow the US government the ability to ban any foreign owned company.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Cool, do Twitter next. Wait, ban Elon…into the sun.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Twitter gives US agencies data, they are cool bro

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Glad to see Dems are taking the threat of Trump getting into power serious by focusing on issues that their base support:

  1. Stop funding and supplying a genocide
  2. Packing the clearly biased court so things like student loan forgiveness can pass and all these anti trans and other crazy far right laws get shot down
  3. Not breaking rail road workers strikes
  4. Banning one of the most popular social media apps
permalink
report
reply
-4 points

Nevermind the bill has bipartisan support! Republicans must have ZERO to do with this bill! 🙄

Get serious or get out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Bringing up that it had bipartisan support is completely irrelevant.

The headlines are going to be “Biden signs bill banning Tick Tok”. When his support of a horrible genocide is already depressing how much non republicans want to vote for him going out and doing this is just adding more reasons.

Maybe you and him need to get actually serious and focus on things people actually care about.

He is only campaigning on “I’m not trump” like literally if you got to his website and click on “Joes Vision” you get taken to a 404 page. There’s nothing talking about where he stands on issues or what he offers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He is only campaigning on “I’m not trump” like literally if you got to his website and click on “Joes Vision” you get taken to a 404 page

(X) Doubt

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Okay and? How is helping the GOP do this going to win support on the left?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Nevermind the bill has bipartisan support!

In general, “bipartisan” just means the oligarchs are teaming up to fuck over the people.

The good “bipartisan” bills are the ones that the Republicans and Democrats come together in solidarity to vote down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

An app that they already made an account for Biden on too lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Gotta do what big corporations want him to do

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 469K

    Comments