Jury is shrinking, not growing

Kayla Epstein in New York

Jury selection is now into its third day, and we have actually lost a juror rather than gaining any.

We are now down to six. Here is how we got here:

As my colleague Madeline Halpert reported earlier, Juror #2 asked to be excused because people in her life had started to figure out her identity based on news reports.

It goes to show the extremely high stakes not just for Donald Trump, his lawyers, and the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, but the 12 regular people who will be swept up in the trial along with them.

The court went back and forth over the most revealing questions – about employers and employment history. Justice Merchan ultimately agreed with Trump’s lawyers that it was important to obtain information about prospective juror’s employers.

But he issued a caveat: those answers will be struck from the court records, and he directed the dozens of reporters watching from an overflow courtroom not to publicly report those answers.

*** A further update posted just now … ***

Madeline Halpert reporting from court

We’ve just been told that juror number four has been excused.

That means we’re now down to five jurors. We don’t know why exactly he was dismissed.

58 points

This is just another form of delay tactics by the defense, nothing more.

The longer they drag out jury selection, the longer the trial runs, which gives them more time for everything from prepping the defense to giving the ranting monkey more time for his campaign.

permalink
report
reply
-42 points

This is just another form of delay tactics by the defense, nothing more.

Do you have proof of that or are you just guessing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Let’s see, first there was complaints on Truth Social about not being able to dismiss an unlimited number of jurors without reason for dismissal:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-gripes-he-cant-reject-unlimited-jurors-in-new-york-hush-money-trial/ar-BB1lNmzY

Then just hours ago the DA asked the Judge to hold him in contempt for poor remarks regarding potential jurors:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/da-asks-judge-to-hold-trump-in-contempt-for-disturbing-truth-social-post-attacking-prospective-jurors/ar-AA1nffCs

Then there’s the mountains of previous trial evidence showing the same acts of slowing down the judicial process, which simply eludes anyone to the same conclusion I gave: It’s a delay tactic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

maybe a middle ground -

he (ie trump) and his team have done the slow walk and delay for everything we’ve seen publicly regarding legal matters. everything takes so much longer than it needs to (and then it’s a problem), so perhaps years of empirical evidence leads to an educated guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

There was a lot of discussion on this yesterday. It seems to me like way too much information regarding the jurors is getting out.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Well, yeah. Trump is a wannabe mob boss and is using his cult to tamper with the jury.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

The information getting out is on the Judge and how they manage their courtroom. Its their courtroom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Yes, because people who break the law run it past the judge first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah, I highlighted some of that here:

https://lemm.ee/comment/11220419

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

They are going to try to doxx every juror in every one of these trials and they could succeed.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

If Trump’s people get the names, there’s a 100% chance they leak them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They have Russian hackers on their side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

What a clown show.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

That’s what you get when you put a clown on trial.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 510K

    Comments