When asked about the federal government’s role, 41% of Americans say it should encourage the production of nuclear power.

Let’s get those new construction contracts signed!

31 points

Cool, now we just need to convince Americans 50 years ago of that and we might manage to save the planet yet.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

You’re probably right, we’re fucked. May as well go harpoon some right whales.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Fossil fuel and monopoly utility owners desperately trying to direct resources away from the thing killing their profits to something they know is ineffective with astroturfing campaign. Fox news watchers parroting what they’re told.

News at 11

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

The one trick big carbon doesn’t want you to know about!

Confuse the only contenders to fight each other and maximize your profit while they decide whose “right”

Don’t forget to like and subscribe

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There’s only one contender, buddy. This “if only you’d stop fighting and just direct 10x the resources at a non-solution” schtick is even stupider than the rest of the lies.

The nuclear industry is owned by the same people as big carbon. The only people parroting this garbage are the same people that have been pushing coal and climate denial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yikes! It’s not about sticking it to the man. I don’t care who owns the nuclear industry.

I care about leaving an atmosphere to the children. Nothing can get in the way of that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I want to see evidence of this vast rightwing conspiracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Now if only they can get the NIMBYs in Nevada to support yucca mountain so we have a safe place to store the waste.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

“What do they do with these after we seal them?”

“I hear they dump 'em in an abandoned chalk mine and cover them with cement.”

“I hear they’re sending them to one of those southern states where the governor’s a crook.”

“Either way, I’m sleeping good tonight!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Those rods still contain something like 90% potential energy that we’re discarding.

10%

U238 is not fissile and no closed breeding fuel cycle has ever been demonstrated to the point of running even a single full fuel load.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why is it on Nevada to deal with your shit (and the costs of cleanup when you fuck up like WIPP or the German repository)?

If it’s a solved issue, then execute the solution where you make the mess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If it’s any consolation, Nevada and a lot of the landlocked states are probably gonna get teabagged by climate change anyways, haha. Arizona is running out of water. My city in Montana nearly ran out of water a handful years ago, the largest one in the state. Like, out out. The river was only six feet deep and very narrow.

We nearly ran out of water again this past year when all the snow melted at once due to an early heatwave and cause the river to jump over 16 feet, which destroyed the water treatment facility and destroyed entire towns and national parks along with it. I moved to a different state after that. Somewhere less volatile.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Will only happend if Las Vegas runs out of water and lose population. Then they’ll want the related jobs, income, and tax revenue. Until LV dies, it’ll never happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I don’t mind more nuclear if it’s done in a modern and safe fashion. The US has a tendency to build old fashioned water cooled reactors that output nuclear waste that we have to find a place for. And we do stupid things like building them on fault lines and flood zones.

Why not build a pebble reactor? Or molten salt?

permalink
report
reply
7 points

The current gen nuclear reactors are the only ones that have a chance of being built with all the known drawbacks. And even if we started building them like crazy, it would still not be enough to meaningfully contribute to mitigating climate change. All the other designs, like Thorium or SMRs are just pure science fiction and at best decades away from being viable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

We went to the moon in 8 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And it was just dumb luck that all the guys made it back safely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

At least that’s what they want you to think

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

If this magical reliable, cheap, abundant, fast to deploy molten salt handling technology existed, the people with it would be dominating the storage industry with carnot batteries on every abandoned (and active) coal plant as well as the solar industry with 2c/kWh CSP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They are funding modern reactor research/development. One example is x energy.

https://x-energy.com/

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The reason not to build those things is we don’t know how yet? Not well, for power production.

There is a clear path forward. The only place where nuclear fits in the puzzle is specific locations where wind and solar are non-viable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Well its not really a choice with climate change about to wreck most things.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Yeah cooling them with river water won’t work in the summer pretty soon and since it takes almost 10 years to build it really isn’t a reasonable choice if you see how many renewables you can rollout in that time with that money

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah, that’s what most people fail to grok. This summer, 2023, will be the coolest summer for the rest of your life. In frightfully few years, weather catastrophes will be as commonplace as gas station stickups, and all of the ‘modern conveniences’ will be doubtful at best.

The internet will be frequently and increasingly unplugged, highways will buckle, flying will be only for oligarchs, hospitals will be amateur efforts, Hollywood will be in flames, pro baseball will be untenable, and wild hoards will roam what used to be the cities, searching for food.

In this mix, it’s laughable to imagine there’ll be full, stable, well-trained staffing at nuclear power plants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Interesting that you included baseball on that list

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The whole comment was me retyping something I’d texted to my oblivious Republican nephew a few days ago, and he’s a baseball fan. :)

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments