Stanley Kubrick, the relentless perfectionist who directed some of cinema’s greatest classics, was so sensitive to criticism that, in 1970, he threatened legal action to block publication of a book which dared to discuss flaws in his films.

The director of Spartacus and 2001: A Space Odyssey, warned the book’s author and publisher that he would fight “tooth and nail” and “use every legal means at his disposal” to prevent its publication – and he did.

Now, 25 years after his death, the book Kubrick did not want anyone to read is being published, more than half a century late.

The Magic Eye: The Cinema of Stanley Kubrick by Neil Hornick now has three prefaces reflecting its subject’s ruthlessness in trying to block publication and control his image.

Hornick, now 84, from London, said Kubrick’s legal threats had come as a shock: “I regard it as a painful episode.”

122 points

A well regarded artistic mind being kind of a piece of shit? I am shocked! I’m just thankful personal favorites of mine like Orson Scott Card, J.K. Rowling, and H.P. Lovecraft are fine, upstanding individuals who’ve dodged controversy at every turn.

Wait hold on… He’s a massive homophobe? She said what? He named his cat that?

Oh… well… umm… lovely weather we’re having huh?

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

i figure, if you dig far enough into most any creator, you are more likely to find an asshole than not. the effect increases with increasing remove (ie they lived a long time ago).

i don’t say this to excuse what’s problematic, but i believe bad people can make good art, and also that most people aren’t angels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

I remember reading a biography (autobiography maybe; forget who actually wrote it) on HP Lovecraft where it mentioned his cats name and I thought “well he was from the 1800’s so product of the time…” and then find out the dude was so racist, the KKK kicked him out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

So glad someone is calling out card here.

Orson Scott card is a pile of shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

And his work is shit. I have no idea why so many adults think that young adult level writing and storytelling is the work of a master.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

i don’t particularly recall that it was intended for young adults at the time. it was just genre fiction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Tbf the first books of misunderstood child prodigy messiah in a sci fi setting were pretty good. The lack of much deviation for everything following sucked. Then there’s his politics…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Card’s short story collection, Unaccompanied Sonata, is great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yeah I thought Enders Game was the best book ever when I read it in like 4th or 5th grade. I read through the whole series of books over the next few years and enjoyed them at the time. I went back to read Enders Game as an adult and realized I just really enjoyed the wish fulfillment in reading about a bullied kid smashing the bullies face in then running shit. You’re right, it’s a pretty basic book and I have no idea why any adult would hold it or Card up as anything but basic. The only good thing I have to say about it as an adult is that it helped ignite my love of science fiction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

That’s the nice thing about being a Terry Pratchett fan. The more I learn about him, the more I love him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

And Tolkien. Fuck his estate though

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

And L Ron Hubbard! Wait…

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

To be fair, the name of Lovecraft’s cat was the tip of the iceberg when it came to him. I love the world building he did, but it’s kind of hard to read a lot of his stories filled with big-lipped, dark savages. On the other hand, with Lovecraft, it seemed less a case of “white people are superior” and more a case of “all of humanity deserves to be thrown into the hellbeast pit, but white people should be thrown in last,” which is… still racist, but I guess not supremacist exactly?

Apparently his Jewish wife occasionally had to remind him who he married when he would go off on an antisemitic tirade, which I find quite amusing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

What I really love about Lovecraft was how inclusionary the community around the Cthulhu mythos has become.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Nope. Lovecraft was about as white supremacist as it gets - he literally excused lynchings of black folks and the KKK’s terrorism because, supposedly, white people had to resort to “extra-legal measures” to protect themselves from (supposed) “mongrelisation.”

Ie, just your bog-standard white supremacism on a stick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

The cats name was Nagger Man it was a black cat, and lovecraft was terrified of black people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
-8 points

That’s a lot of deflection of personal self hate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

What a snowflake

permalink
report
reply
15 points

What a baby.

permalink
report
reply
-32 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Did you just get possessed by the ghost of Kubrick?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

I love his movies and he was definitely a genius director, but man, was he a gigantic asshole…

permalink
report
reply
63 points
*

A total monster. The way he treated Shelly Duvall on the set of The Shining was inexcusable. I absolutely love his films, but he was a very bad man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yep, I have to go watch Popeye so I can see her happy again

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

He also called Stephen King at 3 in the morning, asked him stupid questions about his book and then hung up on him without even saying goodbye.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

I’d say that’s the least of his crimes when it came to The Shining. He gave Duvall a nervous breakdown and her hair started falling out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

My primary complaint about Kubrick is that, despite all his accolades as an auteur… Virtually all of his films are adaptations of other works.

The closest he comes to an actual original work is 2001, but even that has a basis in a few short stories, and Clarke collaborated on the film, producing the novel at the same time.

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If his fanbase was satisfied with simply calling him a director, I wouldn’t be bothered. For me, it’s elevating him to auteur status that’s troublesome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I mean, most of those “adaptations” are extremely loose, his movies differ wildly from their source material in most cases

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I don’t know why that would be a complaint. A directors job isn’t to write a screenplay, let alone an original.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A director, yes, but the Kubrick fanbase elevates him above being a mere director which is why I used the word “auteur”.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/auteur theory

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

The same is true about Shakespeare. Almost all of his plays are derivative.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 23K

    Posts

  • 579K

    Comments