56 points

counterpoint: “I signed an NDA” is an easy cop out if I don’t remember or don’t feel like talking about what went on at previous jobs in job interviews

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Non-competes aren’t non-disclosures. Your cover story is safe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

The poster said “now do NDAs”, which is what the parent is referring to

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Yeah, I read a couple of comments before getting to this and completely forgot there was a title.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

I always thought non-compete agreements were so bizarre. like why would a company get to have any say where I can work after I stop working for them lol. Same vibes as an HOA telling you what color you’re allowed to paint your house or how long your grass can be

permalink
report
reply
24 points

We have the freedom to enter into contracts, tankie

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

More like a HOA telling you that you can never paint a house blue again in your life, even after you move out

permalink
report
parent
reply

This is good, but iirc I seem to recall being told in business law years back that most non competes were unenforceable in court

Still, I suppose that’s 1 point for this admin, 533,256 against

permalink
report
reply
22 points

And companies kept using them anyway, because how many employees know it’s unenforceable, or would be able to fight a much larger company trying to enforce it?

I’m expecting more of the same here.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah…the wording of ‘nearly all’ non competes being voided worries me as well. I wonder if we’ll just see corporations weasel a way around this to keep using them

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

From the official FTC release it looks like existing NCAs for senior executives are still enforceable but new ones can’t be written.

Really curious if this ruling applies to public employers as well as private.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I suspect it’s an exception for matters of national security, ie the MIC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They’ve been unenforceable in California and New York for several years now, but I think in other states they were still valid.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I was thinking less along the lines of being outright nullified by definition, and more them not passing the basic tests, but that’s good to know. Looks like a lot of other states also already had conditions outlining their use (at the bottom of that link)

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

I can go steal all my former clients from my prior employer now lol

EDIT: actually nevermind, that’s a non-solicitation agreement which is different from a non-compete.

permalink
report
reply
28 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I actually can’t do this, I forgot I have a non-solication agreement with my former employer for 2 years (meaning I can’t poach clients) versus on non-compete (meaning I can’t go to a competitor)

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s funny, I can’t help but think Adam Smith would come around to socialism if he saw what capitalism has become in the 21st century.

Behind every socialist is a disappointed free-market enthusiast.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

not if the supreme court has anything to say about it

permalink
report
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.6K

    Posts

  • 135K

    Comments