210 points

Oh, I would have thought Reddit themselves would offer such a service

permalink
report
reply
86 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
*

He’s got to get them from somewhere. They certainly aren’t coming from his little piggy brain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Please don’t insult the pigs, they’re smart and sensitive creatures

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Reddit is past the point of no return. He might as well speed it up a little.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Like a built in brand dashboard where brands can monitor keywords for their brand and their competitors? And then deploy their sanctioned set of accounts to reply and make strategic product recommendations?

Sounds like something that must already exist. But it would have been killed or hampered by API changes… so now Spez has a chance to bring it in-house.

They will just call it brand image management. And claim that there are so many negative users online that this is the only way to fight misinformation about their brand.

Or something. It’s all so tiring.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

That would be an unmarked ad. I don’t think that’s legal in many places

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Probably.

So, we complain to a regulatory body, they investigate, they tell a company to do better or, waaaay down the road, attempt to levy a fine. Which most companies happily pay, since the profits from he shady business practices tend to far outweigh the fines.

Legal or illegal really only means something when dealing with an actual person. Can’t put a corporation in jail, sadly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
146 points

The only reason reddit was valuable was because it was from real people who weren’t paid off. Well that’s ruined now.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Yeah, I’ve noticed that a bit lately anyways. Maybe I’m looking up stuff that has less of a community on Reddit, and thus has less discussion, but I have absolutely noticed some comments have a single product name-drop with little clarity for why they liked the product. It starts to feel like they’re just ads (generated or otherwise) meant to trick you into thinking Reddit users are liking the product.

AI is going to just make it worse, and cause Reddit to not be a good goto for actual reviews and discussion on pros/cons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

There’s an excellent chance that even some of the “authentic” discussions you see are word-for-word reposts of old posts and comments, created by bots to build up karma in order to be sold to spammers and influence peddlers down the line.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The first obvious wave of this stuff, to me, was the video conversion ripoff software and similar. They had people looking around for questions their software was possibly a solution for. Sometimes they would act like users, other times it was more neutral info, but still clear it was self promotion because of what was recommended.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Exactly. Usually there’s a conversation or a quick consensus on one or two things. But I’ve been seeing lots of single answers or just ads

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I wanted to figure out what game hosting sites were good and Google pointed me to reddit…every thread was full of boilerplate ads for different sites. The comments were the most obvious, marketing-approved sentences I’ve ever seen

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Everything I can find online seems to be advertisements or paid reviews (Also advertisements) when looking for anything anymore. Businesses are terrified of an open honest conversation about what is good and what is not

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I so don’t understand how to run a business.

  • Spend $Billions shoving advertising down everyone’s throats? Absolutely!

  • Just make a good product and provide good customer support? It will never work!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If you’re terrified of honest conversations, your product is probably shit.

Marques Brownlee had a video recently about the question “do bad reviews kill products?” that highlights the issue well

permalink
report
parent
reply
88 points

Doesn’t mean that the fediverse is immune.

News stories and narratives are still fought over by actors on all sides and sometimes by entities that might be bots. And there are a lot of auto-generating content bots that post stuff or repost old content from other sites like Reddit.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Especially since being immune to censorship is kind of the point of the fediverse.

If you’re even a tiny bit smart about it, you can start hundreds of sock puppet instances and flood other instances with bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I try to avoid talking about how indefensibly terrible Lemmy’s anti-spam and anti-brigading measures are for fear of someone doing something with the information. I imagine the only thing keeping subtle disinfo and spam from completely overtaking Lemmy is how small its reach would be. Doing the same thing to Reddit is a hundred times more effective, and systemically accepted. Reddit’s admins like engagement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Put in those tickets. It’s a community effort y’know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It’s an arms race and Lemmy is only a small player right now so no one really pays attention to our little corner. But as soon as we get past a certain threshold, we’ll be dealing with the same problems as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I feel the same about a lot of Fediverse apps right now. They’re kinda just coasting on the fact that they’re not big enough for most spammers to care about. But they need to put in solid defenses and moderation tools before that happens

permalink
report
parent
reply

Can’t some instances make some sort of agreement and have a whitelist of instances to not block? People would need to register to add their instances to the list, and some common measures would be applied to restrict someone from registering several instances at once, and banning people who misuse the system.

That wouldn’t solve the problem, but perhaps would make things more manageable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You can’t block people. Who would you know, who registered the domain?

What you’re proposing is pretty similar to the current state of email. It’s almost impossible to set up your own small mail server and have it communicate the “mailiverse” since everyone will just assume you’re spam. And that lead to a situation where 99% of people are with one of the huge mail providers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

Generative AI has really become a poison. It’ll be worse once the generative AI is trained on its own output.

permalink
report
reply
33 points
*

Here’s my prediction. Over the next couple decades the internet is going to be so saturated with fake shit and fake people, it’ll become impossible to use effectively, like cable television. After this happens for a while, someone is going to create a fast private internet, like a whole new protocol, and it’s going to require ID verification (fortunately automated by AI) to use. Your name, age, and country and state are all public to everybody else and embedded into the protocol.

The new ‘humans only’ internet will be the new streaming and eventually it’ll take over the web (until they eventually figure out how to ruin that too). In the meantime, they’ll continue to exploit the infested hellscape internet because everybody’s grandma and grampa are still on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

I would rather wade with bots than exist on a fully doxxed Internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yup. I have my own prediction - that humanity will finally understand the wisdom of PGP web of trust, and using that for friend-to-friend networks over Internet. After all, you can exchange public keys via scanning QR codes, it’s very intuitive now.

That would be cool. No bots. Unfortunately, corps, govs and other such mythical demons really want to be able to automate influencing public opinion. So this won’t happen until the potential of the Web for such influence is sucked dry. That is, until nobody in their right mind would use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That sounds very reasonable as a prediction. I could see it being a pretty interesting black mirror episode. I would love it to stay as fiction though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

You’re two years late.

Maybe not for the reputable ones, that’s 2026, but these sheisters have been digging out the bottom of the swimming pool for years.

https://theconversation.com/researchers-warn-we-could-run-out-of-data-to-train-ai-by-2026-what-then-216741

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

New models already train on synthetic data. It’s already a solved solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is it really a solution, though, or is it just GIGO?

For example, GPT-4 is about as biased as the medical literature it was trained on, not less biased than its training input, and thereby more inaccurate than humans:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landig/article/PIIS2589-7500(23)00225-X/fulltext

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points
*

So the human shills that already destroyed good faith in forums and online communities over time are now being fully outsourced to AI. Amazon itself a prime source of enshittification. From fake reviews to everyone with a webpage having affiliate links trying to sell you some shit or other. Including news outlets. Turned everyone into a salesperson.

permalink
report
reply
31 points
*

Amazon itself a prime source of enshittification

I Turned Bottles of Amazon Drivers’ Pee into a #1 Bestseller. Amazon don’t care about their workers’ bladders, but do you know what they do care about? Selling stuff.

“I only do this because I have no other options,” he says. “Other people who go slower just end up getting fired.” I let Christian leave, and hail some more drivers. They all confirm that this is, largely speaking, how their life looks. I hear about how female drivers often develop urinary tract infections from holding it in for too long. Then a dispatch manager I bump into by chance confirms that the “disgusting” bottles of urine outside of fulfilment centres are from Amazon drivers. ​​“We have a point system where, if you pee in a bottle and leave it in the car, you get a point for that,” they tell me. I ask: How many bottles until they’re in trouble? “Ten bottles.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 597K

    Comments