91 points

Sure I’d rather vote for someone with Bernie’s politics but that’s not on the table right now. I’ll happily vote for Biden over literal christo-fascism and the destruction of our democracy any fucking time.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Yeah, I see it as voting yes on a referendum to actually have a 2028 election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I have a feeling that’s how all of our elections are going to be from now on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

When people we won’t vote against literal fascism because the alternative isn’t their ideal candidate then ya. Republicans have no reason to not choose a dictator as their candidate next time when the dictator this time has a legitimate chance of actually winning.

What needs to happen is for the Republicans to lose so abysmally that they see this shit isn’t going to work and they restructure and kick out the crazies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’d rather vote for someone with Bernie’s politics but that’s not on the table right now

And America’s oligarchs will ensure that it never will be

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Never be deceived that the rich will allow you to vote away their wealth. Lucy Parsons

Every election we will be faced with 2 shit choices, and voters are to blame for keeping it that way

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

Probably ninety percent of those would want to replace any relevant Democrat that made it on the ballet. Big deal. What a useless story.

permalink
report
reply
66 points
*

Yeah, that’s the expected result for any party that isn’t a cult.

If 62% wanted to replace him with the same alternative candidate, that would be significant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

That’s because we don’t respect dance.

Ah five! six! seven! eight!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Starting at five? That’s too progressive!

Kids these days don’t respect a one, a two , a one two three four.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You call that a pirouette? Chin up and again!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

What?

This is percentage of Biden voters…

The majority of people who would vote for him. Wishes there was any other option.

That’s a pretty big story

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Anyone thinking about responding to this poster, please look at their post history so you know what you’re getting into with regard to ANYTHING even tangentially related to Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

True for the OP too. There’s definitely an element on some of the Lemmy communities that seems to exist only or at least primarily to push negative Biden prop (or barring that, anti-US prop in general). I checked Reddit recently for the first time in months (kind of like going to Walmart–avoid it like the plague, but sometimes you just can’t), and I was genuinely astonished at how little anti-Biden content was present by comparison.

I’m voting for Joe in November, and you should too. Joe’s administration killed non-competes, flipped the procedure for airline canceled and delayed flight refunds (i.e., pro-consumer), and pushed back the exempt employee loophole–and that’s just the news from this week. He’s an awesome president without even considering that the other side is composed entirely of criminals, Russian assets, and fascists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I just had to block them. Don’t even need to see the username to know who it is. Engaging with them and even the OP here is nothing but a carnival of bad faith arguments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

It’s an important fact, but hardly a major or unique case. I know I’ve personally never felt like any of the candidates in any of the elections I remember were great, just “good enough” or “better than some of the alternatives,” I certainly would’ve replaced them if I could.

Looking at some recent primaries

Back in 2020, Biden only had 51.7% of the votes in the democratic primaries. That made him by far the biggest single candidate, but that also means that almost half of democrats would have probably been happy to replace them with one of the other 4 candidates if they could (though they would have disagreed on which of the 4.) Most of them would still go on to vote for biden despite him not being their first pick.

In 2016, trump won with 44.9%, again the biggest single candidate, but that means that 55.1% wanted not trump. Of course most of that majority still held their nose and voted for him in November, but the majority of them probably would have been happy to replace him at that time if they could.

2008 was really fucking close for the Democrats, Obama beat out Hillary with 48.1% of the vote to her 48%, and the remaining 3.9% voting for various other candidates, that means that the majority (51.9%) of people wanted a candidate other than Obama. Same year, McCain won his primary with 46.7%, so again the majority did not vote for him but for various other candidates.

And I think it’s pretty safe to say that in just about any election throughout history, voters would like to replace the opposing party’s candidate if they could, no surprise there.

A really big news story would be if the majority of the party not only would replace their candidate if they could, but were actually in agreement on who they would replace them with. If 6 in 10 Democrats said “We would like to replace Biden with this one specific other person that we all agreed on” then that would be big news.

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

Replace everyone in the house and senate if youre serious about changing anything

permalink
report
reply
8 points

yea companies do this type of shit all the time

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They dont do it often enough else these fuckheads that have latched onto the taxmans tit for 30/40 years wouldnt still be there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Ever see a story in the sidebar, and know before clicking on it who posted it?

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

It’s a tone thing.

There’s a few regular article posters than either post articles with a certain tone to the headline or they editorialize the post title to fit their narrative. It’s similar to how you can notice how somebody you’re familiar with writes and uses language and can identify potential alt/sock puppet accounts from them.

Due to this I’ve come to believe that these people are astro-turfers with a disengenous agenda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Whats a sidebar?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I’m running on mbin; it shows randomly selected stories / random communities in the sidebar (which I think Lemmy doesn’t do) with no additional details besides the title.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The Community Info. Depending on the website layout it is often displayed on the side of the screen, as a sidebar next to the main content. It usually has things like community rules. Some layouts and mobile apps refer to it as the sidebar, community description, or the community info.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Everyone to your left is a trumper. Got it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

Nice!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That wasn’t a compliment lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

100 percent of return2ozma political posts are attacking Biden.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

If they’re not a voter suppressionist trying to get Trump elected they’re doing a great pretending to be one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Is the Hill trying to get Trump elected too because they published it? And these 62% of democrat voters - paid shills? Russian bots?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
4 points

No pro-genocide centrist cares.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 486K

    Comments