102 points
*
Could it be some sort of meta joke where the reviewer is mocking how the paper is written by imitating its bad writing style?
59 points
I bet it’s a form with multiple entries, each entry is not different enough of the other ones:
How is the subject of this paper ?
What about the style ?
You checked to reject it, why should it be rejected ?
What’s the overall comment ?
Then it’s all concatenated into one blob of review.
92 points
Not to mention it is poorly written.
40 points
13 points
*
48 points
Wrongly motivated?
52 points
20 points
5 points
46 points
It’s like they were trying to do a compliment sandwich but the best compliment they come up with is “poorly written.”
11 points
3 points
35 points
As a large language model, I find this paper to be poorly written.
