170 points

This entire time I have never said a bad thing about Barron Trump. His future was not set for him. He could still be a decent person. But now that he is 18, and involved in the Republican party, he is fair game.

Tiny Trump is Total Trash.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

I’m not gonna pretend he deserves anyone’s pity or that you should change your opinion here, but acting like 18 is some magic age where someone is suddenly completely responsible and free of childish impulses/problems is ridiculous. Society may need to set an age for accountability in a legal sense, but socially, humans just don’t work that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

At 18, he’s legally free to walk away from his shit-for-brains father and make his own choices.

He chooses nepotism. He may not be totally mature, but they are his choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

He’d be free to walk, taking a leap into the unknown at the cost of losing almost everything he has. Expecting that sort of heroic act of him is not entirely reasonable.

OTOH, judging by the photos, he does give off Brock Turner/Kyle Rittenhouse vibes. If, having grown up where he did, he turned out to be an aggressive predator, it would not be a huge surprise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Also, why do we act like 18 is the magic minimum age when someone should know better? I remember being 15, 16, 17 and having a solid understanding of morals and how to participate in society. I wasn’t special.

It’s not “You’re 18 now, so you should know better.” It’s “For fucks sake, you’re 18. You should have figured this shit out years ago.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It took me well into my 30s to walk away from religion. Especially in an isolated environment, it’s likely he doesn’t really understand his choices, and though he has had a much more comfortable way of life than us, it’s still hard to transition to a much less forgiving way of life. I had to leave behind friends and family I still wish I had a good relationship with, but the cultlike environment (JW) is specifically designed to discourage leaving. Learning about other viewpoints are heavily discouraged, as is associating with people not in the same belief structure.

While mine was religion, with how polarizing his father is and the protection needed, I don’t doubt he had even less access to other people and viewpoints than I did. I at least got to meet people online, at work,and through shows (funny enough, Futurama was a huge part of breaking me away) to get some other viewpoints, but some of my friends were homeschooled and wouldn’t watch or be allowed to watch almost anything secular.

It’s why so many are afraid to allow kids to go to college (pretty discouraged by JW also), because they might change. I say at 18 the chance of someone in his position being able to get alternative experiences is slim to none.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

He’s not a minor anymore and he can make decisions to be in politics or not. That’s my point. He was totally unknown until now. I was HOPING he would disown his family. But, apparently they’re all insane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Definitely agree, but for what it’s worth, I certainly didn’t stop being a dumbass teenager the moment I turned 18.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

It’s akin to waiting until someone turns of legal age to fuck them. It’s creepy and downright wrong. He was born into this and it’s grim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Yeah, but he made a choice there. And for that choice he deserves to be criticised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

IDK, the power that people have over him is probably way too much. 18 year olds are still highly influenceable and he’s likely under a lot of pressure from his family and their political cohort to join in.

Try saying no to those people, he’d likely lose everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Especially when you have constant pressure to be that way from everyone around you. Truth be told, I’ve always just felt bad for the kid. Sure we’re to the point where you’ve gotta expect him to at least start thinking for himself, but that type of deprogramming takes a long ass time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Well, feel bad until he starts slamming minorities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

He could turn into the RFK of Trump, maybe.

Edit: RFK jr

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So he has worms in his brain? Uh oh!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Made me lol, but whatever it takes

permalink
report
parent
reply
127 points

Daughter In-law co-chair of the party, son is a delegate, daughter and son in-law are part of the cabinet.

The red hats are looking a LOT like the red coat monarchy that we declared independence from.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

Conservatives want to be ruled by a king. That’s why the ruling class created political conservatism post-revolution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

We really should have some sort of law that if you hold any high office of government, your immediate family (maybe for 2 generations) is permanently barred from serving in a similar capacity. Some sort of anti-dynasty law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

Gotta ask if you were saying this when Hillary ran for Senate, when she was Secretary of state, or when she ran for president, which would have been her effective 3rd term

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yes. Do you think this is some sort of gotcha? Only right wingers want rules that only apply to one side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
107 points

Fuck nepo babies and dynastic politicians.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Makes you wonder how many people didn’t vote for Hillary just because of something exactly like this, makes you wonder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hillary, for all her faults cannot be accused of running on the Clinton name alone - she put a lot of distance between herself and they started off as two independently active politically engaged people. I loathe her for other reasons - but she was in politics by her own motivation (and was an extremely active first lady when she was).

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

So if Baron Trump has entered the world of politics, that means that the rest of his life is no longer closed to scrutiny. Stupid move. You can’t have it both ways.

permalink
report
reply
68 points

I’ve always wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt, regardless of who his parents are. He’s about to throw away that goodwill.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I’ve only ever seen comments online saying they feel bad for him being in that environment or that they hope he turns out normal. In hindsight, it’s kind of astonishing any Trump was afforded such grace from the general public.

And that little shit threw it away his very first chance to do so. Fuck him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Nepo babies are gunna be nepo babies.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 389K

    Comments