42 points

Kinda deserved. 2.0 really fixed a lot of issues and promises.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

It’s almost the game they promised

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

I just started the game after 2.0 and it was an absolute blast. Loved all of it. No bugs.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

me to but the auto raising stats checks sorta bummed me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Can mod it back if you’re on PC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

yeah I have been thinking of it. im on steamdeck which means I have to go into desktop mode but it annoys me to have to mod it over like setting a difficulty otpion or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Meanwhile, I’ve been playing Baldur’s Gate 3 now, and it is absolutely the buggiest game I’ve ever played. It is unreal how many big and small bugs I’ve had at nearly every turn. If I were CDPR, honestly I’d be pissed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

I played through it. It was a stunning game, no bugs. Glad I picked it up.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Took them how many years and updates?

I’m waiting for the expansion to be at 10 to 15 €, and play CP through again.

Edit for a serious question: Who’s downvoting this? Pre-launch buyers?

Yes, CP is a good game now but remember the state it was in when CDPR asked full price for it at launch. You can’t even call it launch when it didn’t even take off on the PS4.

Just take a minute and read all the patch notes tagged with something like [added]. You’d be surprised how barebones the OG Cyberpunk was.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Probably a bad idea to complain about devs actually fixing a game

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Someone who thinks games should be fully fleshed out when released is getting downvoted? The game shouldn’t of required fixing in the first place. Why the fuck are people these days so willing to accept unfinished products? They promised the moon before release and people rightfully lost their shit when it didn’t meet expectations. Why should we praise them for fixing their fuck-up?

I’ve completed the game twice and it was fantastic. I just hate how the bare minimum is what’s expected now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

We praise them for fixing their fuck-up because most don’t. And when we want to see this behaviour changed we gotta promote the better way. Same with No Man Sky.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Developers fixing a game is not a problem, it’s desirable, even expected.

Making the game playable (like it was advertised) is not called fixing. That’s developing the game.

CP wasn’t an Early Access title, they wanted full price for three quarters of a game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

they wanted full price for three quarters of a game.

And what they delivered crashed a lot, had game breaking bugs, and brain dead AI despite the fact it could teleport, still wasn’t really effective.

Even in a beta state you still expect the law’s physics to apply, and not prevent accessing the rest of the content.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Cyberpunk 2077

!cyberpunk2077@lemmy.world

Create post

Everything Cyberpunk 2077

Rules

  1. Be cool. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia etc.

  2. Mark spoilers and NSFW

Friends

Community stats

  • 269

    Monthly active users

  • 263

    Posts

  • 1.9K

    Comments

Community moderators