-24 points

I am one of the <1% that vote Green.

My only agenda is shouting into the void because I am effectively powerless.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Just because you can’t solve everything all on your own doesn’t mean you’re effectively powerless.

What does make you powerless is refusing to act because you have to be part of a crowd to help, instead of some lone avenging angel who can solve everything with a snap of their fingers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

No, what makes me powerless is that 99% of people who vote make the same choices every election regardless of the quality of the candidate.

And that, I definitely cannot change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

At some point in history, voting was about picking the best, most qualified candidate.

In recent years, voting has become picking the person that makes the other color lose.

I wonder what the Founding Fathers would think of what their country has become.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

You are not powerless, but on Lemmy you may feel like your opinion doesn’t matter due to the overwhelming liberal population.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m a Green Party voter.

I am powerless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I guess I gotta appreciate the honesty??

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How is lemmy overwhelmingly liberal? I’d say there are more leftists then liberals here

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

At least you’re honest about it

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No reason to hide it.

The shameful thing is being a proud Democrat or Republican after the last 40 years of regression for the American people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

The shameful part is people like you help usher in fascism so you can feel superior

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Please keep voting.

Would I recommend you vote differently than you say? Maybe, but so what. Just please vote, and encourage others to vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

While I like the joke, Wakko is actually a boy. He had a crush on Miss Bambon, so one could assume hetro. Humorously, Dot also had a crush on her. 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️

permalink
report
reply
56 points

I agree that se is obvious supposed to be a boy, but I don’t understand your premise. You can be agender and have a crush on a woman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Not really trying to make a point. But he’s not agender. Dot is bisexual though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Your comment seemed awfully opinionated for not trying to make a point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Nonbinary does not imply asexuality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

True. Wakko’s pronoun is “he” as the show has decided.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Also true. But we must consider the fact that when the show was airing, though I’m sure non-binary people certainly must have existed at the time, non-binary was not something that was part of the mainstream consciousness. So would not have been acceptable in a kids show. And though I’m not sure it would even be acceptable in today’s day and age by most mainstream standards, it’s more acceptable now than it was 30 years ago.

On top of that it’s very likely that most real people at that time who would likely identify as non-binary would not have identified themselves as such and would have chosen a he/she pronoun of some sort to identify themselves in order to conform to the social standard of that time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

And plenty of nonbinary humans use and prefer the pronoun “he”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

He’s a Warner sibling, which means that at any moment he’s exactly whatever is necessary for the joke to work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Um… they are called the Warner Brothers (and the Warner Sister). Is he non binary now?

permalink
report
reply
59 points

It’s a joke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points

It’s a joke based on Yakko not having a gender. Which doesn’t make sense. Therefore my confusion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Do you take Wile.E.Coyote running into a wall after the roadrunner runs through it literally too?

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Cartoons operate under the rule of funny, anything is allowed for the joke

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Which doesn’t make sense. Therefore my confusion.

There are people who do not identify as having a gender, this is commonly referred to as “Agender”. People who identify as Agender may not identify with the concept of gender, some may attempt to present gender neutral, while others may not make an effort to present any specific way. It’s one of the many NonBinary identities, that is people who don’t identify as exclusively male or female. I can understand though that for some it might be confusing as it has only been receiving mainstream recognition relatively recently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not originally, but this does sound like the kind of boundary pushing puny joke they’d make to make the straights slightly uncomfortable.

[No no no. Finger Prints.

I don’t think so.](https://youtu.be/lY2kC5fZG64?si=uPoB4wzgMdvy6e-J)

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

It’s not canon but he has been adopted by the NB community as a sort of an icon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

In the remake’s theme song; “We’re gender balanced, pronoun neutral, and ethnically diverse!”
While the fun is in the fast pronunciation of longer words, they’re pointing to a split gender diagram chart between Yakko (male), Dot (female) and Wakko (split). So even if it’s based in a joke from old episodes, WB seems to have run with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Remake??

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yup! They did a remake in 2020, never watched it myself cause Hulu but I’ve heard some good things about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

There’s a panel from the Animaniacs comic where Wakko states that his gender is “other”. It floats around the internet ever few years. The comic was, I believe, back in the 90s so I’m not sure I’d say “now”. They have always used the term “brother” and he/him pronouns for Wakko though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I love how politically charged the show is haha

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The show is politically charged because… there’s an enby person? Or am I misunderstanding you

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Wait, there’s comics? I thought it was just a cartoon

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

“nonbinary”

permalink
report
reply
6 points

What, not to going to be pedantic about them spelling gender as genda while you’re at it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

That’s a completely different thing, because it’s on purpose to match the “agenda” word, while “nonbinery” on purpose or not, is what someone who doesn’t read much would write, as a non native English speaker I’m kinda pedantic about such errors

permalink
report
parent
reply
120 points

They have an agenda, so they assume everyone else does too. It’s always projection.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

Universal happiness and prosperity could be a part of an agenda as well right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

no, because there is no such thing as universal happiness.

everyone’s happiness is different, and often conflicting.

for example, my father’s happiness would have been me playing football. I hated sports. hence, he hated me until he died for ‘hurting him’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

He’d be much happier in the grand scheme of things if he accepted his kids as they are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

This is a strange exclusionary way of considering happiness, tbh.

Like even if I want, and maybe even would be most happy, to sit down in front of a plate of duck a l’orange for dinner doesn’t mean I can’t or won’t be perfectly happy eating a sirloin steak for dinner instead

Edit: for clarity, I am referring to your father’s view on happiness, not your response to it

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That really sucks. Can practically feel the tension through your post. What a bummer… shouldn’t kill anybody to let somebody else be happy doing their own thang (and be happy not necessarily copying another person’s thang).

Less importantly:

When I think about ‘universal happiness’, I’d think it’s more about creating conditions where everyone has the opportunity to pursue their own version of happiness, rather than imposing a single idea of happiness on everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Not an agenda people talk enough about

permalink
report
parent
reply

memes

!memes@lemmy.world

Create post

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.8K

    Posts

  • 62K

    Comments