Alabama is seeking to become the first state to execute a prisoner by making him breathe pure nitrogen.

The Alabama attorney general’s office on Friday asked the state Supreme Court to set an execution date for death row inmate Kenneth Eugene Smith, 58. The court filing indicated Alabama plans to put him to death by nitrogen hypoxia, an execution method that is authorized in three states but has never been used.

Nitrogen hypoxia is caused by forcing the inmate to breathe only nitrogen, depriving them of oxygen and causing them to die. Nitrogen makes up 78% of the air inhaled by humans and is harmless when inhaled with oxygen. While proponents of the new method have theorized it would be painless, opponents have likened it to human experimentation.

228 points

That’s a pretty good way to go, apparently.

But there have been an absolutely breathtaking number of death row cases that have been overturned due to new evidence that had exonerated the condemned.

It seems pretty clear that the state is doing a very crappy job of determining guilt, and therefore shouldn’t be handing down such a permanent sentence.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

breathtaking

Heh

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

I used to fully pro death penalty, especially for some of the sick fucks…

But then I learned about all the false convictions, some COERCED by the fucking police, and since then I’m 100% against the death penalty.

The satisfaction I get from a heinous killer getting killed, does not outweigh the horror I feel for even one innocent life being taken by the state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It’s also cheaper to keep people in jail forever than put them to death because of all the appeals. And despite being more careful, we still get it wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Also, in my mind, death is a release. Keep those fuckers stuck in their filty meat suits while they rot in prison for the rest of their lives with no hope for escape. The especially heinous ones will get extra comeuppance from the other inmates

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Right. Even a life sentence can very much be reversed if exculpatory evidence appears.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It can be overturned, but it can’t be reversed. You can’t give someone those years back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This is what changed my mind on the death penalty. I have no problem putting a murderer or pedo to death, but we keep freeing people when new evidence is found that proves their innocents. Until we can get it right 100% of the time, we should just lock them up until death.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah this is one reason why I generally don’t support the death penalty. There’s no way to undo it. At least if evidence exonerates someone 50 years later, they’re still alive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Not to give anyone ideas but: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_bag

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I would argue that we need the death penalty as a way to protect society from the absolutely most dangerous criminals but it’s very frequently misapplied. I would say, for instance, that people that are serial killers, or serial rapists (or serial child molesters), people for whom there is no significant doubt that they’re guilty, and people that will reoffend if they ever manage to get out of prison, should be executed. A simple murder for hire, or a robbery? No. Ed Kemper? Absolutely.

I think that even life sentences with no parole are overused; most people can be rehabilitated and returned to society safely, if we were willing to dramatically overhaul our criminal justice system to not be based on punishment and retribution. (But if we did that, then how would we get free prison labor…? /s)

permalink
report
parent
reply

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_by_country

All of western Europe has abolished the death oenalty completely. Many of these are countries with very low rates of serious crime.

Meanwhile countries with the death penalty, but usually also very long prison sentences and high rates of incarcerations like the US are pretty bad with crime.

It is impossible to justifiy the death penalty empirically. The statistics actually indicate that the death penalty is linked to more crime.

Also the problem is, that clear cut beyond a doubt is what every judge who sentences someone to death, will claim about the case. Yet there is hundreds of cases in the US alone, where people were later exonerated. Some only after they have been murdered by the state already. There is nothing to gain, but a lot to loose with an execution. It cannot be overruled anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The statistics actually indicate that the death penalty is linked to more crime.

Correlation =/= causation. C’mon, you know better than this. It’s more probable that they have lower crime to begin with. Serial killers are not uniquely American by any stretch of the imagination, but they are quite uncommon relative to the population in other developed countries.

Read what I wrote again. I’m advocating for the death penalty in very, very limited cases, where there is no significant doubt at all, where there is no reasonable or even unreasonable belief that an offender can be rehabilitated, and the offender is extremely likely to harm more people if they ever have the opportunity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s wild you disagree with life sentences and desire rehab, but also advocate for the death penalty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I advocate for it in the case of people that can not reasonably be rehabilitated and pose an unreasonable risk to the existence of other people.

I don’t know why that’s difficult to wrap your head around.

You aren’t going to rehabilitate a serial killer, or a serial rapist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Prisons (at least in the US) have never been about prisoners and their reform. It’s about how much money they can bring in from the state and practically free labor. Like most things in the US it is driving by profit margins.

…yay capitalism

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Eh, no. We had prisons before we used prisons as a stand-in for chattel slavery. OTOH, we used to kill a lot more people for much less severe offenses, so people didn’t usually end up in jails for very long. And there was a period of time where we believed in reform, but that was well over 100 years ago now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-57 points

Yep, NO. I’ve tried it. You can’t get a breath and you feel like you’re suffocating.

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

Nitrogen hypoxia is a risk wherever liquid nitrogen is used. If too much boils too fast, it will displace the oxygen in the room. People in the room won’t even realize what happened until they pass out and die shortly thereafter.

There are reports of people rushing in to rescue those who passed out, and suddenly passing out themselves and needing to be rescued as well. That’s how insidious it is. And that’s why MRI scanners (which use liquid nitrogen) have oxygen sensors in the room. You can’t trust your own body to tell you that all the oxygen is gone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

MRI machines are cooled by liquid helium. Nitrogen is not cold enough. I’d imagine as a noble gas it has a similar effect though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Definitely doesn’t seem terribly traumatic - https://youtu.be/176eog7mZjc?si=B4TPpWw7CJb-IGXl

(CW - shows pig putting its head into a box filled with inert gas to eat food. The pig falls over, regains consciousness, then immediately places its head back into the box to continue eating)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Can you please share more of your experience? What was the occasion and the set-up? What was it like?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sure, Jan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s not the case with nitrogen asphyxiation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I’m willing to bet what you inhaled was carbon dioxide – that gives an instant feeling of suffocation. Which ironically makes it one of the safer asphyxiant gasses, as it’s heavier than air and you can detect it’s presence instantly. Inert (“noble”) gasses like helium, argon, and nitrogen don’t have that effect.

CO2 is also cheap, readily available, non-toxic, and doesn’t cause physical damage. This makes CO2 asphyxiation somewhat popular for “stunning” or killing in places like slaughterhouses, labs working with smaller animals, or “feeder” animals for reptiles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
137 points

Pro Life™️

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Yeah, that’s a lie, always has been.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

They wouldn’t know “pro-life” if it bit them on the ass. They’re simply pro-birth. Literally everything else about the GOP platform is anti-life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Pro birth so they can supply meat to the industrial grinder and dead solders for the war machine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

And here I am on Life Lite like a pleb.

permalink
report
parent
reply
93 points

Small government folks sure are horny about giving their government the power to murder them.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Actually the (small L) libertarians are a little split on this issue, with most seeming to agree with me that the death penalty is a stupid fucking idea from multiple standpoints. Can’t trust the govt to get a damn thing right and that is no-take-backsies so no room for fuck ups (which they definitely have fucked up and killed innocent people, only to learn someone lied after it is too latw.)

OH you meant the republicans, who say “small government” but then through their actions prove they are just “the other side” of “big government” from the dems. Well, they’re “lying” in order to manipulate people into voting for them (tbf, I know that’s how they all get votes).

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Sure, but as long as they have the death penalty, it’s probably best they do it as humanely as possible.

Some states are bringing back firing squads, which definitely feels like a huge step back. If they’re going to kill someone, using an actual painless option instead of lethal injection or shooting them seems like as much of a step forward as we can get up to actually not executing people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

firing squads are probably a better idea than the lethal injection

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

For the person being executed, firing squads are among the most “humane” methods. It’s fast, reliable, and simple. It’s not common because the brutality of painting someone’s brains on the wall is too clear for onlookers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think they typically aimed for the heart. In an by case, it causes trauma to the executioner too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Typically they aim for the heart. Not exactly an immediate or painless death.

I’d rather have the nitrogen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yep. Which is how we end up building FUCKING concentration camps in the country and pave that road for a dictatorship to take over one of, if not the, leading super powers of the world.

This shit needs to stop and we need to address what is happening in the south before we start having some repeats that end in mass death. Enough is enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points

FWIW, nitrogen asphyxiation is one of the methods that’s preferred by advocates of assisted suicide. Done correctly–by which I mean in a way that doesn’t allow a buildup of CO2 in your bloodstream–it’s not only painless but gives you a mild high. The proper way to do it is with something like a BiPAP, where the air that’s being piped in is pure nitrogen, and the CO2 is all being removed immediately so you aren’t breathing it back in. Without a buildup of CO2 in your bloodstream, your brain doesn’t recognize that you’re suffocating.

Have you ever breathed in helium from a balloon and gotten lightheaded? It’s about like that.

I’m in favor of the death penalty in very, very rare cases–and this is not one where I would support it–and this is one of the surest, least barbaric ways to execute someone.

permalink
report
reply
26 points
*

Let’s tighten this up a bit.

Inert gas asphyxiation is very much a great way to go, but it’s basically symptomless until after you lose consciousness.

You don’t get high. The “high” people get is when they are choked out. I’m not really sure on the mechanism of that, though. You don’t get lightheaded. The lightheadedness is from the blood oxygen levels increasing.

This is why it’s very dangerous to enter enclosed spaces. You simply don’t know you’re about to die until it’s too late. Plus, people come in to try to rescue you and succumb as well.

Anyway, lots of people have this experience. It’s a common part of training for rebreathers for use in scuba diving.

As far as good ways to die, inert gas asphyxiation is up there with “proper” lethal injection (i.e. with a commercial euthanasia drug), opiate overdose, or just anesthetizing the being and doing whatever gets the job done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Nitrogen can cause a “high” (aka nitrogen narcosis), but this effect only occurs at high pressures. So it is only a practical concern for divers, because they have to breathe high pressure air. Some divers replace the nitrogen in their tanks with other gases to avoid it.

It is unrelated to asphyxiation, and can occur even when the lungs are properly exchanging oxygen and CO2. It is a poorly understood direct interaction between high pressure nitrogen and the brain that does not occur at atmospheric pressure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Correct. Extremely different thing.

Also, despite what they say in fight club, oxygen does not get you high either.

Nitrous oxide however…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

When I did my deep diving certification one of the things they got us to do was try and do maths of varying complexity (compared to previously doing it on the surface). I didn’t feel high at all, but most of us had slower response times and more errors at depth, apparently as a side effect of the increased nitrogen. Pretty wild.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

IIRC the hypoxia “high” panic reaction is from an elevated level of CO2 - that’s the evolved mechanism by which humans detect they’re in a bad place for breathing. Not absence of O2.

Edit: Correction: Hypoxia alone gets you high just before you keel over. It’s the CO2 buildup that activates your body’s panic reactions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

When I was ~10 I attended a wedding. Me and the other kids where tasked to fill balloons with helium and we did so without supervision. Naturally, we breathed some helium in and talked in funny voices.

I then had the bright idea to try to breathe as many of these balloons without normal air in between.

After the third of these, I lost conciousness. To me it felt as if I was gone for maybe half an hour. I was basically dreaming weird stuff. Luckily I stayed in my seat during that time and didn’t fall over or something. Noone of the others noticed anything, so it couldn’t have been that long. Maybe a few seconds in reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
86 points

If ever I would need to be killed, this would be my preferred method of leaving the earth.

Happy to see them try it, even though I am against executing people.

With hypoxia, you get euphoria prior to death. No suffering, no pain, just a little high to send you off this earth.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Should do it to animals too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Indeed. I have read that the reason we don’t is because it takes too long.

That’s why they use CO2 asphyxiation, but in my opinion, that’s torture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

CO2 asphyxiation is extremely unpleasant. That is absolutely torture, and it is not in any way shape or form an ethical way to euthanize anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-88 points

Leave the earth? “This” earth? What do you mean?

permalink
report
parent
reply
103 points

He means die. People use lots of euphemisms when talking about death. This is one of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

When people leave this earth they are welcomed onto the yearly space rocket that asends into the heavens. After a month of travel they land on Pluto, where the big farm in the sky is. That’s where your pets and grandparents are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

That makes sense, thank you

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That sounds way too close to Hale-Bopp /Heaven’s Gate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

It’s a common English phrase that refers to dying. The use of “earth” uncapitalized refers to the ground or land, not the planet Earth. You might be more familiar with the variant “leave this earthly plane,” which, by the way, has nothing to do with airplanes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

sounds like someone never learned about Xenu and the other earths.

Tsk tsk tsk. What are they teaching in school these days…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ah, a fellow OT III.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 468K

    Comments