134 points
*

the court accused him of an “ideology of maximum privacy.”

In what twisted fucked up crazy world is that a bad thing?

I hate this timeline…

permalink
report
reply
4 points

If you read the verdict it says: maximum privacy combined with optimal obfuscation techniques. This implies that the sole role of the software is money laundering. The striving for privacy itself is not in question.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Free software can be used for what every you want to use it for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I do not disturb that in any way, just clarified the verdict from Dutch

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you guys do want to get into crypto to buy certain…things, though if ill advise it, I’d recommend Monero not stuff like Bitcoin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
106 points

The same logic should apply to manufacturers whose products are used in committing a crime…

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

That logic they’re using should be burned with fire.

With that logic, cars being highjacked for a crime should make the company liable for the crime (Revolutionary actions would also count as crimes). That gives car manufacturers alot more legal reason for adding kill switches to their vehicles’ engines, which would most likely be used by cops for whatever the fuck they want.

How about DJI’s drones being used to kill individuals in Ukraine? Steam decks are currently also being used by Ukraine to control machine gun turrets remotely, and they’re able to be used that way explicitly because they use regular OS’s (a major boon to its users.)

This type of regulation would only further lead to anti-consumer products, and a stronger police state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Uhh really hope that’s sarcasm…

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I dunno. If you manufacture tools designed specifically for killing, for example, you’ve definitely played a part in somebody’s use of your tools for killing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I can’t think of many examples. Maybe electric chairs and guillotines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You hoped right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Well apparently the rest of the people here didn’t get the memo

permalink
report
parent
reply
88 points

By this logic DARPA should be put on trial for creating TOR

permalink
report
reply
46 points

By this logic every locksmith should be put on trial for making locks, every manufacturer of vaults and safes, every lumber company for making wood used in fences, every costume designer for making halloween masks, every post office for renting PO boxes… etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Evil privacy maximalists !

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Dont give them any ideas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Too late

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

That would be the story if a lifetime

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

please don’t jinx it :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh… We are in THAT timeline.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

what about computers and the internet? those were created and used for bad too. also gps and weather satellites.

fun fact: the first digital computer was invented for the explicit purpose of calculating artillery firing tables for the army during the war. what it actually ended up getting used for on its first program, was studying global thermonuclear war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

Looks like development of such things will have to start happening on the dark web. What a ridiculous conviction.

In its judgement, the court accused him of an “ideology of maximum privacy.”

What the fuck is this kind of reasoning? Is privacy illegal now?

Anti Commercial-AI license

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Oops I’m a privacy maximalist now, I didn’t even know. Time to privacymaxx this removed up !!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Damn, even your slurs get maximum privacy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I can’t say removed ?? That’s removed removed !!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Some famous ex felon and computer hacker named Kevin Mitnick wrote some books about privacy maxing, you might want to read a few of them. I guess he’s still a felon, he just served his sentence and is no longer in prison. He did legit steal some people’s identity and commit wire fraud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not a felon anymore. He died.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

privlets don’t stand a chance

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Privacy maximums end up in supermax

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Absolutely disgusting. Privacy is a right!

permalink
report
reply

Privacy

!privacy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 77K

    Comments