16 points

There’s 20 other portraits that are also abstract and now the only one anyone will care about is hers, and she’s ensured millions of people who otherwise wouldn’t know about it have seen it

permalink
report
reply
2 points

streisand effect

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Im of two minds. Leave it up because it causes some rich asshole even the slightest bit of discomfort.

But also, take it down because its a painting of a rich POS who doesnt deserve to have a canvas used in her image, however distorted it may be.

But i dont know shit about anything so

permalink
report
reply

Making rich people upset is almost always good and funny imo

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Take it down unless she doesn’t want it up, in which case, leave it up to annoy her. So definitely leave it up

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah, thats it. Whichever option pisses her off the most is the right one.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The artist was Aunt Tifa

permalink
report
reply
10 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

Cry harder, fragile little nepo-baby who would decry cancel culture and defend the use of racial caricatures for mascots as “honouring” the people they are supposed to represent.

You’re just being honoured, sweetie. Let people honour you okay?

Also she’s a perfect case of the “garbage-out” side of the garbage-in, garbage-out equitation. [CW: for some really egregious racism] This is the person who raised her speaking candidly in a time that exists within living memory for a lot of people. This entire family needs to be abolished, along with Australia, asap.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

permalink
report
parent
reply