Islamic State extremists have almost doubled the territory they control in Mali in less than a year, and their al-Qaida-linked rivals are capitalizing on the deadlock and perceived weakness of armed groups that signed a 2015 peace agreement, United Nations experts said in a new report.

The stalled implementation of the peace deal and sustained attacks on communities have offered the IS group and al-Qaida affiliates a chance “to re-enact the 2012 scenario,” they said.

12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
6 points

Lack of awareness is probably why their influence has grown.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Feels like trump came along and American/western media focused on him instead. I also thought ISIS was irrelevant

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Conflict in the Sahel has been heating up over the past decade but it’s a lot of small groups.

The reason Americans are likely seeing this in their news cycles all of a sudden is the recent coup in Niger.

  • The US has a military base in Niger.

  • Mali and Burkina Faso are now aligned with Niger - and Mali has Wagner forces.

  • Niger is mineral rich and also a big supplier of uranium, particularly for France.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

4% of the French uranium is from Niger, not really a big supplier

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

ISIS is irrelevant. This is a splinter group in Mali. Closely related, but ISIS itself (as in the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) has been entirely forced back into the underground

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Power hungry assholes with guns are always a thing

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The panel of experts said in the report that the impasse in implementing the agreement — especially the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of combatants into society — is empowering al-Qaida-linked Jama’a Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin known as JNIM to vie for leadership in northern Mali.

Sustained violence and attacks mostly by IS fighters in the Greater Sahara have also made the signatories to the peace deal “appear to be weak and unreliable security providers” for communities targeted by the extremists, the experts said.

The panel said the armed groups that signed the 2015 agreement expressed concern that the peace deal could potentially fall apart without U.N. mediation, “thereby exposing the northern regions to the risk of another uprising.”

The U.N. force, or MINUSMA, “played a crucial role” in facilitating talks between the parties, monitoring and reporting on the implementation of the agreement, and investigating alleged violations, the panel said.

The panel said it remains particularly concerned with persistent conflict-related sexual violence in the eastern Menaka and central Mopti regions, “especially those involving the foreign security partners of the Malian Armed Force” – the Wagner Group.

“The panel believes that violence against women, and other forms of grave abuses of human rights and international humanitarian law are being used, specifically by the foreign security partners, to spread terror among populations,” the report said.


The original article contains 577 words, the summary contains 222 words. Saved 62%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
1 point

The french or the US are going to use this as pretext for military intervention, aren’t they?

permalink
report
reply
-27 points

Ok… And?

Is this one of those posts?

You know which ones.

The kind where America is expected to go solve everyone’s problems because no one else will. But the same people who would love to see the US solve the world’s problems, also condemns the US every time it interferes in some other country’s internal affairs.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Nowhere on the article is mentioned the United States. You’re the one bringing an America centric discourse and acting like you’re the victim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

That’s because everyone loooooves to beg and plead the US to solve all their problems, pay all their bills, fix this, dethrone that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

People like you are the ones that embarrass the rest of us. Stfu.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No we want America to stay at home. The last time they funded radical groups in Syria, in their illegal and failed attempt to unseat the Asad regime, the result was a deluge of refugees in Europe. Nobody wants this kind of help.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

We WANT to stay home but that doesn’t stop every mistreated and spoiled group out there begging for American intervention. Lord knows no one can count on the UN or any of the European countries to do anything. They can barely help their own fellow European neighbor after it was invaded. With friends like that…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We got involved in Syria so John Kerry could have a legacy after losing and to get a pipeline built. Like all Middle East adventures the goals were not achieved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Ok… And?

And nothing. It’s a world news sub. Articles about world news.

There doesn’t have to be a hidden message to you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

What the other guy said, but also, last time Mali had this problem flair up just a few years ago France did the intervention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The US should never have involved itself in Syria.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We should never have gotten involved in anything in the Middle East. We did because of oil and Israel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

The kind where America is expected to go solve everyone’s problems

Well, the current government in Mali is the result of a military coup. The previous, elected government was friendly with France, and the new, military coup crowd is friendly with Russia.

Then when the coup guys decided that they didn’t need to hold elections when they said they would, they got condemned by the US.

https://www.france24.com/en/africa/20220112-un-security-council-falls-short-of-imposing-new-sanctions-on-mali-after-elections-delay

Russia, China block UN Security Council from supporting new sanctions on Mali

Russia and China blocked the U.N. Security Council on Tuesday from supporting new sanctions on Mali for its military leaders’ decision to delay next month’s elections until 2026, a blow to the restoration of democracy in the troubled West African nation.

So I vaguely imagine that said government probably isn’t asking the US to become involved, because the US’s position is that they should have held elections.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 273K

    Comments