After weeks of local speculation, the purchasers of 55,000 acres of northern California land have been revealed. The group Flannery Associates – backed by a cohort of Silicon Valley investors – has quietly purchased $800m worth of agricultural and empty land, the New York Times has reported. Their goal is to build a utopian new town that will offer its thousands of residents reliable public transportation and urban living, all of which would operate using clean energy.
Why not?
Because they leeched off of our infrastructure to get where they are, and now they want to take their cake and eat it alone…
We provided their cities, infrastructure, education, healthcare, educated and financial stable customers, and now that they’ve hoarded all the money, they want to build themselves a new city without the normies…
Fine, but they can also build their own army to protect them, their own water treatment centers their own garbage disposals, their own education network, and if they want to interact with the rest of the country we’ll tax them at 500% the rate because of the douchebag tax.
So working public transportation = utopia ?
How can one country be so disconnected from reality?
Maybe it’s a utopia that also has clean energy and public transportation.
Either way, I don’t trust the agenda. If they’re legitimately trying to help, something good might come of it, but it won’t be a utopia as humans will human.
Hopefully some valuable lessons will be learned without too much suffering.
It’s like advertising running water. Utopias are supposed to be IDEAL cities. We’re talking no hunger, no disease, etc. Not just a few bus stations, something present in any major city.
Not enough bus stations in every city. I’m like 5 miles in Florida heat away from the nearest bus station. I am only 2 miles from the nearest grocery store, so I’m not exactly rural. Public transit here is a joke.
They misspelt distopian.
Both are correct, because there is no universal spelling standard in English.
Even if there was, it would be run by nerds and you can beat them up.
In seriousness, both are correct, but dys is more correct. Dis is the Latin prefix, dys the Greek (from the Latin, language is fun), but utopia is Greek as well.
Dis was nonetheless a common enough spelling before dys became the generally preferred.
Do you have a source? I looked it up just in case it was a regional or outdated spelling, but all I could find was “Dustopia”, the original spelling of “dystopia”, first appeared in Lewis Henry Younge’s Utopia: or Apollo’s Golden Days in 1747.
I’ve never seen “dis” used, and even if we were using Latin prefixes wouldn’t that mean “benetopia” would be as correct as “eutopia”? It’s pretty clear that OP spelled it wrong which was very funny in context.
Genius. This area is a barren shit hole and a lot of it will be under water within 10 years.
Yeah I really don’t understand the location. Anywhere in California is a dumb idea. They will still have to deal with wildfires, drought, earthquakes, high tax rates. Why not Idaho? It’s probably even cheaper.
I agree. I live in California. Over the last five years, 70% of my county has been overrun by wildfires.
There’s a lot of natural beauty here. But if there’s a God, God hates this place.
Idaho seems like a more logical choice.
Plus I’ve worked at TFB. The vibe I got is that folks there don’t have a lot of respect for people who don’t have real jobs.
how about we build a guillotine on the land instead
