24 points

It’d be great if posts like this could include a) the location, b) when it was taken and c) who the photographer was.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

This photo was taken in central Scotland around July 2022, I’ll tag stuff with OC in the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

…where in central Scotland?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s why I actually like car infrastructure.

If one day. Self driving cars become reality, many people will be able to live without owning one themselves.

And then the places previously occupied by cars will ensure that there is room in cities for some green.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Or you could design cities to have green in the first place by designing for better modes of transport than cars. Cars take up a huge amount of space both while traveling and while not in use, instead of spending all that money and space on cars you can have public transit, cycling infrastructure, walking infrastructure, and greener cities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Easier is just to have covered parking lots, with a green roof. No massive societal changes requires, just an expensive parking garage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Or you could design cities to have green in the first place by designing for better modes of transport than cars.

But there are no better modes of transport than cars. They are literally the most used vehicles on earth. This means they have topped every other form so far. The natural next step in the cars evolution is self driving electric vehicles. So cars will be used by multiple people, so there are less cars overall and those cars could be stored in large strategically well placed big parking lot buildings.

Cars take up a huge amount of space both while traveling and while not in use, instead of spending all that money and space on cars you can have public transit, cycling infrastructure, walking infrastructure, and greener cities.

I agree on cycling infrastructure and other forms of public transport. The more options people get, the better. But cars are irreplaceable. Car infrastructure is the most flexible we have. Ambulances, police, craftsmen, busses, taxis, you can easily transform them into pedestrian territory, or turn them into bike lanes. And as I claimed before, if the next 100 years bring us new technologies and self driving cars revolutionise public transport, then this infrastructure offers the option to increase green surfaces in cities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But there are no better modes of transport than cars. They are literally the most used vehicles on earth. This means they have topped every other form so far.

This is an appeal to popularity. Something being popular does not make it the best or good. Bikes are also insanely popular - with around ⅔ as many bikes as cars world wide. Car usage also varies highly from city to city. Unsurprisingly those that have good viable alternatives have much less car usage. Build lots of roads you get lots of cars.

Self driving is not a solution to the massive inefficiency of cars; it’s likely to make it worse. Improving the quality of a mode of transit generally results in increased usage - this is known as induced demand. Not needing a license nor having to pay attention means more people will opt for the car instead of alternatives, resulting in more congestion.

They’re also unlikely to reduce the number of cars per person. Assuming self driving cars are cheaper than the current situation why would people voluntarily sit next to a stranger in a locked metal box when - for less than they were paying before - they could not do that. They’d also be trading off journey time - the number one thing people care about in regards to transit.

So more people would use cars, but cars are parked unused 95% of the time, isn’t there efficiency to be gained there? Yes, most likely. But the thing to remember is the majority of cars are on the road at the same time during peak hours. Even if you double the efficiency here you’d at best be reducing the parking needed by 5%.

You are right though in regards to cars not going anywhere. They are a valuable mode of transportation, especially in rural areas. Hopefully self driving won’t make car dependence even worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Yes is a good dream but you know the capitalists will make it PAYG that is over priced and takes half your weekly wage

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

What does that have to do with capitalism? All the other options aren’t for free either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

OR, the sad reality will probably be that Entrepreneurs will buy these places and simply build more houses on them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

On the big parking spaces? Yea probably. But the smaller parking spaces along the roads? I don’t think that the place is big enough for housing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

it’s a tree park now

permalink
report
reply

Reclaimed By Nature

!reclaimedbynature@lemmy.world

Create post

A community dedicated to examples of nature fighting back and reclaiming aspects of human civilization. Be it whole buildings, simple structures, or smaller items.

Rules:

  • Post only content that features nature overcoming man and man-made objects. Original content is especially welcomed.

  • Please use mainstream webhosting sites (Imgur, Flickr, Youtube, Vimeo etc).

  • Please try and give credit to the original photographer and Original Poster when possible.

  • Reposts are fine, as not everyone spends all day on Lemmy. However, please do a quick search and make sure the content hasn’t been posted recently.

  • Be civil and hold yourself to the site wide etiquette. No bullying or harassing. If you have a problem with a post or comment, please report it, tick the ‘other’ box and cite the rule break in the comment section or send a modmail.

Community stats

  • 3

    Monthly active users

  • 99

    Posts

  • 90

    Comments

Community moderators