-39 points
*

125° F that’s above boiling temperature in Flaffenfeit!!! But boiling what is the question? Probably somebody’s temper.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

That’s a common misunderstanding.

125°F means it is 25% hotter than 100% too hot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

So 125° F is like saying it’s WAY TOO HOT! Thank you, I think I’m beginning to understand Flaffenfeit better now.

It’s a bit like measuring in yards, but they never say whether it’s front yards or back yards, which is quite significant IMO. But even a hundred yards isn’t very far, so I guess they must have some pretty funny small yards over there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It’s nearly the boiling point of Acetone

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

And that means that using nail polish remover in weather like that is going to be annoying. That stuff evaporates very easily as it is, but in weather like that it’s all gone as soon as you open the bottle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Hey look, that FO stage of FAFO is well underway. Hold onto your butts people, there’s going to be some serious self punishment for our generations of polluting the world for personal convenience and money.

permalink
report
reply
83 points

It will be felt most by those least responsible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Very much so. It’s completely unjust and we (me included) have been beyond wasteful in spending the Co2 (and other climate altering materials) irresponsibly for far too long.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

The poor and low-polluting people of the world are being punished for the actions of the wealthy and highly polluting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

So very true. The vast majority of the climate damage has come from the US, China, and Europe, but more equatorial regions are going to be crushed by the heat for an unknown time. The cost to humanity is likely going to be beyond anything our models have projected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If they haven’t yet, they need to start emigrating north ASAP before the borders start shutting down (and they will).

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

The Pakistanis who can’t afford air conditioning and have to do manual labor outside weren’t the ones who FA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Percentage wise, Pakistanis and other peoples living in equatorial regions definitely aren’t the major contributors to this catastrophe, but they’re going to be the spearhead of the FA phase. It’s going to be one of the most unjust repercussions of the actions by the most industrialized and wealthy nations upon the less wealthy ever in the history of mankind (and maybe the end of mankind in the process).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Remember this the next time you get the chance to punch a racist in the face who thinks brown Islamic people are poor because they have “backwards tribal beliefs” or that the Middle East is always a hopeless mess because people there are dumb and can’t work together.

Life is short, you could die in a car accident tomorrow, who knows? Don’t miss your chance while you have it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And the disgusting irony that the ones being punished are the younger generation. I’m GenX. I apologize to my kids profusely for the mess I had a hand in making. It’s not getting fixed until it gets a lot worse. I’m scared for the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
100 points

My family: We should save the planet!

Me: great, let’s all eat less meat!

My family: . . . No

permalink
report
reply
50 points

This one bugs me so much. Like I’m not even aiming for full veganism. Just… less meat.

No.

“But I like it!” Irrelevant to the problem.

“Other people are worse”. Irrelevant to the problem unless you want to go start doing vigilante justice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

“Other people are worse”. Irrelevant to the problem unless you want to go start doing vigilante justice.

I wouldn’t say irrelevant to the problem… Most of the stuff we as individuals can do, amount to trying to put out a tire fire by clapping… Even millions of us won’t make almost any difference, specially when you have 10 assholes who, instead of clapping are actively pouring gas on the fire

I’m 100% on board with the clapping… But I’m not kidding myselft that we are going to save ourselves until we eliminate the firebugs

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Well, according to kissmyOSfeddit, we don’t even need to eat less meat. We can sous-vide it on the sidewalk now! Sounds like a serious win-win to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s the raising of the animals before they’re slaughtered that’s the problem, not the cooking after they’re dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I have decreased my meat consumption to about a third than it used to be in recent years. I’m not qualified to do an in-depth study about all the ramifications of the CO2 emissions, but agriculture being just about 11.2% of all emissions sounds like eating less cow won’t cut it to “save ourselves”

I have a hunch that shit will hit the fan and there will be a massive reduction in CO2 emissions because of a supply chain failure. Third world countries produce the vast majority of “low manufacturing complexity” products, which will be made even more unsustainable if those regions become a scorched earth. That, coupled with a lesser incentive to travel due to an adverse climatic situation, and a trend in population decrease due to an overall quality of life degradation, will really be the reason why we will reduce emissions, simply because things stop working and become unsustainable

Either way, I don’t think it’s possible to really predict the future and even less so in such a complex society where technology might be a game changer all of the sudden, so my opinion is not really that valid. Even educated estimates using proper statistics/data cannot guess the implications of new wars, AI, new scientific breakthroughs etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Greenpeace: we should save the planet!

Me: great, let’s build nuclear power so we can shut down fossile fuels

Greenpeace: …No

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Too late. Somewhere so sunny can get a lot of solor quickly. Building nuclear power plants takes time and releases a lot of CO2. Batteries and solor now now. Cheapest power too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Only too late because Greenpeace stopped it for decades. Hope you have a plan for your solar waste. Cheapest because you just let China throw it away for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Those nuclear power plants won’t come online for a decade at least. It’s better to spend the money on renewables and storage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And if we started building them a decade ago we would have them now. We need to start building them now, because it’s only gonna be worse in 10 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Greenpeace advocated for this back in the 1970s and that’s why we have an enormous wind and solar industry today. The Greenpeace lobby was just too damned powerful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

nuclear clowns are the least funny

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Everything is a joke to you so no surprise that would be your standard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Greenpeace: …No

Senator Greenpeace and President Sierra Club made Westinghouse bankrupt itself trying to build the Vogtle 3 and 4 reactors in Georgia.

Meanwhile nobody ask who is blazing a trail into the modern nuclear age

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s China! (Said like Trump saying China)

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

First step: just eat less beef.

Even that alone is enough to make a quite decent impact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

that image is based on poore-nemecek 2018 which has terrible methodology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Hm. I would be interested to learn why, exactly. If it has terrible methodology, why is it constantly referenced and why hasn’t a better one been done since then?
Or is there a better one that nobody just uses?
And how should the data look, because most of every other source I can find also agrees that beef is the worst (or possibly on the second spot after lamb) as it comes to CO2 per kg.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

50C is near OSHA’s max limit to touch safe zones which is 60C. At 60C, no matter how many seconds, you will get burnt. At 50C you can hold an object for a few seconds safely.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

But also keep in mind that it’s usually air temperature being measured, with surface temperatures being even worse than that!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

50C is near 60C

Nnno…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You know how 0C is far from 60C but you can easily experience 0C in a winter? Well check it out, 50C is closer to 60C by about 50C difference from 0C. This 50C tends to be near 60C when compared to 0C and really 49 other whole numbers of degrees Celsius! An infinity of numbers if you add decimal places.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s a very… interesting way to think about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Hottest I’ve ever been in is 114f iirc in a dry heat. It was brutal like “you can feel moisture evaporating out of your eyes”, I felt like just sitting around I couldn’t drink water as fast as I was losing it. 125 is bonkers

permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 273K

    Comments