Bill Pruitt, a former producer for The Apprentice whose NDA just expired after 20 years, writes in Slate that Donald Trump used the n-word during the production of the show — and there are tapes of him doing it.

292 points

In a sane world, a draft dodger saying he ‘liked soldiers who didn’t get captured’ would have been enough.

The people who vote for him know what he is, they just don’t care.

permalink
report
reply
105 points

I think in a sane world, after the “grab 'em by the pussy” tape came out we’d have never heard from him again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
101 points

I’ve posted this story many times.

After the ‘pussy grabber’ tape came out, a conservative woman went on the TV show The View to defend Donald.

One of the other panelists kept repeating the word ‘pussy’ over and over. The Trump defender asked her to stop using that offensive word.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Cognitive dissonance does not exist for conservatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

A reminder that there was a candidate who got too excited and yelled in a weird way then got erased because of it. Now we have Robert “brainworm” Kennedy still on people’s radar sounding like he’s gargled gravel everyday since he was 12.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Poor Howard Dean, we could use that enthusiasm now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Not to mention someone misspelled potato once, and his political career got torched from it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Iirc he didn’t even get ‘too excited’ he just had the mic too close to his mouth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That was after losing Iowa, it likely wasn’t the deciding factor on its own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

In a sane world, yes.

In the real world, the people who support him are the ones who identify with him, and the ones who identify with him think that sexual assault is the pinnacle of masculinity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Or justifiable as a means to an end

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
3 points

Upvoted before I clicked it because I knew exactly what you were talking about. Only clicked to verify.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Why is everyone talking about a hypothetical sane world? It’s not. Maybe it never was. It’s a mad mad mad mad world.

(No conscious reference to the movie, it’s just a title that seems apt.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I didn’t get the reference. All I could think of was mad mad mad mad mad Madam Mim from Sword in the Stone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

It’s been said the pain of the bamboozle is too much for most to acknowledge so they continue to double down on it. The great grifters and conmen know this and use it to their advantage.

Many think it’s only the stupid and uneducated that are taken in by these scams. At times it’s the tribal nature that we can get caught up in.

Often the educated are worse off as they know better and the grave injury to their egos won’t allow them to announce to others they have fallen victim as it’s pretty embarrassing. They take their lumps and move on with their lives if they do recognize they have fallen into these traps.

It’s going to be many years before we get to the other side and then I wonder if it will be like what the Spanish referred to as the Miracle that occurred when Franco died.

After decades in power, the citizens that fought for Franco and supported him ceased to exist. When asked everyone fought against Franco in the civil war and they secretly fought against him at every level of society, government, and the military. It was miracle how he came to power and won a war with no support from anyone at any level within Spain.

If we ever get past the identity association of team Orange it will be interesting who is found to still be supporting this current day madness especially among the religious groups that support a man that displays so many of the things many of the regular members would be chastised for…

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

In the 1960 election Kennedy beat Richard Nixon with something like 52% of the vote.

In 1980, they polled a bunch of people who had voted in that election and somehow 99% of them had voted for Kennedy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Politics has become teams winning and losing, and a lot of people don’t like to “admit to supporting the losers”

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It’s been said the pain of the bamboozle is too much for most to acknowledge so they continue to double down on it. The great grifters and conmen know this and use it to their advantage.

People in the UFO scene do the same with their grifters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I recall reading the Sagan’s Demon Haunted World and the section dedicated to this “phenomenon”. The self convincing and conviction to these events was pretty amazing to read about from a curiosity prospective. The letters he would receive were pretty far out there.

My matter of fact father swears late one night while grading logging roads in a remote area in the 70s, he saw a big bright light in the sky that he couldn’t explain and it moved in ways he didn’t expect.

Being out in the wilderness I’m sure it wasn’t a comfortable situation for him. I still wonder what he saw but thankfully there was no accompanying abduction story to go with it in his case. These types of stories and shows did get his a attention forever after as a result.

permalink
report
parent
reply

“It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

Attributed (but debated) to Samuel Clemens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

And it’s even easier to convince them that everyone else has been fooled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

This! We don’t need to call people out or harass them for being stupid. We just need for them to drift away from the cult. The constant publicity and chatter just feeds it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sunk cost fallacy with voting, ugh

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

The thing that makes this somewhat relevant is how close the election is. If those tapes exist, and you can get them to the right social media accounts, it might make 0.5 percent of his voters reconsider (and that might be sufficient).

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

A Trump voter quote that always live rent free in my head is “He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting”.

It tells you everything they need to know about them. They have a shit life, and they want to make damn sure everyone else has a shit life too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Before Trump I could pretend I lived in a world where the great majority of people were reasonably intelligent and kind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Everyone stopped masking post 2016.

Figuratively and literally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s still true. It’s not that the majority of these people are actually thinking, “How can I make the world worse and make the greatest number of people’s lives bad?” Rather, they’re under the impression that others (probably you) are saying that, and worse, that Trump is somehow their best defense against it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s a bully mentality. I don’t want to make things better for anyone, I want to make things worse for them. Literal playground bully.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Donald Trump taught the worst of us that it not only is okay to be a bigoted racist, but that it is okay to be that in public.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Only because they have a misguided sense of revenge and want to blame the libs for their truncated life expectations when in fact they’ve been supporting and voting for the very politicians most likely to keep pushing their heads under water.

They want to hurt their opponents. They don’t care what the price is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Every single time he opens his mouth would be enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

A lot of them care, they just like that he does it. It legitimizes their own shittiness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No, they do care. They think the same way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think they care that he’s relatable to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They relate to the hatred.

permalink
report
parent
reply
143 points

If this tape got leaked, it would literally help his candidacy. The hatred, cruelty, misogyny - it’s a feature, not a bug. There was already a tape of this guy bragging about sexually assaulting women, and it didn’t make a lick of difference. I can see his rabid followers salivating at the idea of hearing him say the N word on tape.

permalink
report
reply
62 points

It might hamper his apparent surging popularity among black voters

A lot of people only care about things when they’re impacted

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Wtf is this true?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2024/05/20/an-early-look-at-black-voters-views-on-biden-trump-and-election-2024/

Overall, older voters have tended to be more Republican than younger voters in recent decades, but this is not true for Black voters. While 7% of Black voters 50 and older currently identify as or lean Republican, 17% of Black voters under 50 are aligned with the Republican Party. This is not new, as younger Black voters have tended to be more Republican than older Black voters over the last 25 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I’ve seen some decent conversations over on Mastodon about how the democrats taking the black vote for granted is causing real damage. Not criticise or focus on you personally at all, but your response kinda backs up the point.

In a hard two party system, what else was going to happen?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Keep in mind that if you ask a random sample of people who they will vote for and ask a sample of people who they will vote for and throw out all the people who didn’t bother to vote in either of 2020 or 2022 you get a different answer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

He’d play the tape at campaign events just to rile them up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Wouldn’t that be straight hate speech?

Is that not a crime, or am I misinformed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

He’s not getting punished for incitement for his speech on Jan 6, why would he get punished for this?

But, yes, if it led to violence it would be considered inciting violence which is technically a crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Hate speech in the United States

In a Supreme Court case on the issue, Matal v. Tam (2017), the justices unanimously reaffirmed that there is effectively no “hate speech” exception to the free speech rights protected by the First Amendment and that the U.S. government may not discriminate against speech on the basis of the speaker’s viewpoint.

It’s not a crime on its own in the US, but if it incites imminent lawless action that can be a crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Depends on what you mean. Is it hate speech from a court of public opinion standpoint? Probably. Is it from a legal one? The US doesn’t have a hate speech law on the books just “Obscenity law” which allows things to be censored.

Canadian law has hate speech but it might not fit that either as to legally be chargable as hate speech it needs to fit the criteria. In this instance it could be argued use of an N slur is Denying, minimizing or celebrating past persecution or tragedies that happened to group members… but it would ALSO need be performative in a public space, intended and performed for a large group. If it’s basically in the scope of him having a private conversation with individuals it isn’t a chargeable offence to public order. If he was shouting it in the street sure but consequences wise it’s analogous to someone shouting “The Duck army is coming!” over and over again outside your house 3am. It’s a public nuisance ordinance. If you call the cops will come over and stop it only if someone complains and at worst they will escort you away and issue a fine but nobody is going to do hard time for heralding the Duck army’s arrival or hate speech.

So like is it hate speech? Maybe. Is he a racist dick who deserves condemnation for being a hateful racist dick? Yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The N word on its own is simply vulgarity. I think hate speech relies on the content of the message.

For instance.

What’s up my n****? - Not hate speech.

Spoiler contains an example of hate speech. It does not represent an actual view that I hold, and it’s one of the worst things I’ve ever written, and should not be read by anyone.

spoiler

I chickened out an deleted it. No one needs to read that shit. Just imagine someone expressing a racist sentiment without using the N-word here.

-Definitetly hate speech without using the N word.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

Lordy, I hope there are tapes!

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Good news: There are tapes!

Bad news: He will face absolutely no consequences from them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Amazon owns the show now so they have the tapes if they still exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Billionaires stand to gain from Trump getting elected again. Don’t count on those tapes coming to light.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Bezos has been targeted by Trump before and could afford to pull off the biggest troll move right before the election

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Billionaires stand to gain from Trump getting elected again.

So the reason he lost in 2020 is…? Those same billionaires all existed then too, you know. Clearly they don’t have as much influence on Presidential elections as you imply.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

According to Wikipedia MGM owns the show. Even they might not own the n-word tapes.

I’d bet that Mark Burnett owns them. And, I don’t think that he’d release them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Ugh I don’t miss that fool. He’s apparently writing fiction now…

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

So bonus points for his followers?

permalink
report
reply
27 points

What difference does this make now? Racism isn’t a republican secret, neither is supporting white supremacy. The few bipoc supporters will minimize it.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

You’re 100% spot on. In 2015 Donald Trump was literally being endorsed by KKK Wizards and when pressed to admonish/censure them he refused.

This is literally not news.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 453K

    Comments