• Twitch on Friday will end the contracts for all members of its Safety Advisory Council, a resource made up of industry experts, streamers and moderators, who consulted on trust and safety issues.
  • The council has advised Twitch on “drafting new policies and policy updates,” “developing products and features to improve safety and moderation” and “protecting the interests of marginalized groups,” per a company webpage.
  • On May 6, council members were called into a meeting after receiving an email that all existing contracts would conclude on May 31, 2024, and that they would not receive payment for the second half of 2024.
108 points

totally normal behavior for an organization /j

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Kind of seems that way lately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

If safety is in the way of a slight increase in profit and there are no expensive legal consequences, safety has to go. And companies like X are testing how far you can go without consequences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

There are consequences for X. Advertisers are pulling out and it’s becoming increasingly unpalatable for companies and people to use, and so its user base is not exactly growing rapidly (although I have no evidence to say it is shrinking).

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

They’re going to replace them with an AI powered tool, aren’t they? If they’re going to replace them at all that is.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

They’ve done that already. I’ve actually gotten banned twice because their AI tool thought I was harassing a streamer. Both reversed almost immediately after an appeal. Guess those appeals may no longer have people responding to them…

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

This is why I’m here. Reddit did the same shit right after their IPO went public. When I declined their early invitation to buy IPO, the next day my account got banned for 3 days.

The first one was a post where a guy in Cleveland had his motorbike stolen. I live in Cleveland. And this guy had pictures of the guy who stole his bike. He looked kind of like the guy who stole my bicycle back in the late 80s when I was a kid. I said “Hey, maybe this guys the son of the guy who stole MY bike 30+ years ago! Keeping the business in the family.”

BANNED 3 DAYS for “harrassment of reddit user”. Who am I harassing? The guy who stole my bike 30 years ago? The guy who stole the motor bike a few months ago? We have zero indication that either of them are on reddit at all, much less in this thread.

Similiar situations like this all happened 2 more times, and on the 3rd time, perma-ban sitewide.

It’s a 10+ year old reddit account, with like a billion karma because I don’t do drugs. I don’t drink much, I don’t smoke, I don’t have hobbies, I only have one addiction and it’s reddit.

And each appeal came back less than a day later and claimed it was reviewed by a human, and agreed upon by a human.

I didn’t appeal the last one, because I’m thinking if I appeal that, and lose, I lose the account. But even though they claim the other 2 times were reviewed by humans, I don’t think they were.

And even still. If they review the appeal, and reverse it, how long until ANOTHER bot does the same thing, and permabans me again?

It really feels like I lost that account. 2022 I was even in the top 1% of comment posters. Instead of making another account I’m just going to switch to Lemmy and help this platform grow instead. Reddit just loses a user that probably posts literally every hour, usually several times an hour. Just whenever I’m bored, I’ll post a comment on something engaging in conversation.

Now I do that here, as I attempt to figure out how to use Lemmy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Fuck ban-happy Reddit and its IPO shenanigans. That place is a dumpster fire that I wouldn’t piss on to put out.

Welcome to Lemmy. It might not be perfect, But At Least We Aren’t Reddit ™

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Just appeal to another AI - two of them can’t be wrong at the same time, I’m sure of it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*

Important: The article mentions that they are being replaced not that the SAC is being done away with completely.

On the other hand:

Twitch declined to comment on whether the [new council members] would be paid.

The text I replaced there is “ambassadors”, that is, Twitch ambassadors, people given a title that means nothing outside of Twitch, but is the only payment these people will be getting, outside, perhaps, a sense of pride and accomplishment.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Haven’t seen that meme in a while lol kudos

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

[Sarcasm] See, they really do care about us! They care so much they’re unhiring everyone whose job it was to pretend they care about us! Twitch is a great company and not an evil ball of shit! I respect Amazon and its owned companies and subsidiaries and whatnot because I know they respect me!

permalink
report
reply
17 points

The joke about corporations realizing they can stop doing “diversity hires” really is true isn’t it? They can do whatever they want, their giant team of lawyers will protect the bottom line no matter what.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 544K

    Comments