Some politicians are so fearful of former President Donald Trump retaking the White House that “they don’t really want to tell the full truth,” West said. “[Biden has] created the best economy that we can get. Is this the best that we can get? You don’t tell that lie to the people just for Biden to win,” West said in a clip played on CNN Sunday.

42 points
*

[Biden has] created the best economy that we can get…You don’t tell that lie to the people just for Biden to win

Straw man arguments like this are what makes it so obvious Cornell West is full of shit. There isn’t a single damn person who ever said that, but Cornell West wants you to think it’s a majority opinion that he’s fighting against.

Back in the real world, we recognize Biden has taken some serious steps in the right direction regarding infrastructure investment, empowering labor, reducing student loan debt, and increasing the portion of taxes paid by the wealthy, among other things. In the real world, we recognize this is as far as he can go with a razor thin Senate majority that depends on the votes of Manchin and Sinema, and we recognize he now has a Republican House to stymy every one of his priorities.

To get progressive policies passed, elect more Democrats to the House and Senate and reelect Joe Biden

permalink
report
reply
-27 points

U just created a straw man, to defeat his straw man. Well done sir.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having refuted or defeated an opponent’s proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., “stand up a straw man”) and the subsequent refutation of that false argument (“knock down a straw man”) instead of the opponent’s proposition.

[Biden has] created the best economy that we can get…You don’t tell that lie to the people just for Biden to win

You assume that West has created a straw man. He claims that the economy could be better. Whether it’s true or not is up to the reader. In order for it to be a straw man, it would have to be untrue. If it is true, then it is not a straw man.

Let’s assume that his statement is true. That the economy could be better. By treating it as untrue, you create the straw man. You then proceed to refute his assertion by listing Biden’s economic accomplishments, thus tearing down the straw man you created.

Remember, this is all dependent on whether West’s statement is true or not. If the reader thinks it true. Then it is not a straw man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Cornell West is a fraud paid for by the right wing. Please don’t fall for his bullshit. I’m glad Sanders sees it.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

cornel west is a respected academic and activist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i don’t think he does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

The ones that had their price was people like Bernie, who sold us out with his sheepdog rhetoric. Liberals love Bernie now that hes pulled back his mask and has fallen in line

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

EnderWi99in is a fraud paid for by the right wing. Please don’t fall for his bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

Everyone who disagrees with me is a paid shill, sure sounds like some rightwing cope.

The centrist liberals pathological inability to tolerate even small amounts valid and reasonable criticism is part of why democrats keep losing elections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Where’s your criticism of Cornel and his unpaid taxes and child support?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Racist trope much?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

cornel west doesn’t need to pay taxes or child support until we dismantle the empire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Strawmanning your opponents is on page 2 of the rightwing playbook.

Can you at least try to counter Dr. West’s arguments? If you can’t, then just admit it. There’s no shame in admitting weakness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Cornell West SHOULD know better then doing stunts like this. Because even if the criticism is correct, he is siphoning blue-voters away to a politically useless or damaging position, like the Green-Party.

Which means he weakens the Democrats.

Which in turn means he strengthens the Fascist-GOP.

We can aknowledge the Truth, but always vote and always vote blue. NEVER risk a blue vote for the need to pride yourself on “fighting the corrupt system”.

Emotional validation is never an argument for weakening the only thing holding back Fascism in the US. To much is at stake!

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

Ive been voting since the mid 80s and EVERY election has been ‘theres too much at stake.’

West isnt syphoning off votes, if Biden or Democrats actually represented the public there would be no concern about him having a challenger and he would win by a landslide, but they dont represent us, they represent capital and only capital. The world is on fire and they are telling us we are ok, most of us can see things are not ok, but getting worse. And the part about splitting the vote is liberal myth, if there was no 3rd party candidate running we still wouldnt vote for the cause of most of our problems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

@K1nsey6 @Ekybio So when you find out the @GOP will be funding the “No Labels” & #GreenParty you’ll be good with that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m expecting them to actually, if it hasn’t happened already. Because they know both will siphon blue votes away from their only RELEVANT opposition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Except the part where thats not happening. Though the DNC has been known to fund right wing candidates, and oppose dems that challenge their ‘public stance’

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

if the criticism is correct, he is siphoning blue-voters away

good. that’s the plan. how is he supposed to win the presidency without someone who previously voted democrat?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Sellout sheepdog says what?

permalink
report
reply
-6 points

Voting against the Democrats to get us ranked choice voting can work on a local and state level. It’s worked best when communities are mobilized and well-organized and educated about the intention to do so. For example, Democrats have tried to primary AOC multiple times.

But voting against Biden on the federal level is taking a huge risk. The gane theory states that doing so will spoil the vote and givr Trump a better chance at winning. Don’t split the vote on the Presidential ticket.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Don’t split the vote on the Presidential ticket.

if democrats are worried about splitting the vote, they can vote for the green candidate, since greens obviously won’t be deterred by democrat admonishment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Splitting the vote is liberal myth, we wouldnt vote for your Wall Street hand picked candidates if there was no 3rd party candidate running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I dont really understand why. I’m trans, not a liberal. I obviously want Biden to win - and it seems even if he is a wall street friendly liberal, he… also wants to give aome kindling to the left. The president will never be able to advocate for the working class the way unions of us can.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You dont understand what, splitting the vote? Biden is not wall street friendly, hes owned by them. They call the shots in government, not its politicians.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments