116 points

iAI

(…will always love you 🎵)

permalink
report
reply
4 points

i AI Captain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points

Let’s be honest. They certainly plan to, but first they’re gonna see if saying “Apple Intelligence” a bunch is going to convince people they actually did something innovative.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

Knowing apple fans, it will work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

This isn’t actually innovative it is just not OpenAIs business model. This recent trend is honestly a much smaller blip than most people recognize.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Most large opensource models run just fine on 8gb. It’s absolutely nothing new…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

We’ll see how it pans out. As of now I don’t know of any phone manufacturer doing on-device AI… so??? Is that innovation?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Google has been doing on device stuff since at least the pixel 3

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Google does on the Pixel line, at least for pictures (and probably more).

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I mean the biggest innovation here isn’t the “AI” (partially “on-device” or otherwise). It’s exposing the apps action hooks to the model.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Ok, so either way, there’s innovation no?

I get the “Apple bad” thing but come on, they actually ARE doing something here

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points
*

They’re trying to make people associate the term “AI” with its long form spelled out, which is obviously Apple Intelligence. The goal would eventually be that when people throw out the term AI, it’s assumed that they mean apple intelligence.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Great point!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

This is exactly why, and as simple as it is, it’s brilliant passive marketing. It stealthily implants an association to Apple Intelligence into every product and article that mentions AI, and might even require the author to distinguish their meaning when they use the acronym. They’ve Sherlock’d AI.

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

Because they can’t patent it and troll everyone else for money.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

What are some examples of Apple being patent trolls? Genuine question

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Samsung Lawsuits: Apple’s series of lawsuits against Samsung over alleged patent infringements related to smartphone and tablet designs and functionalities have been seen by some as overly aggressive. These lawsuits have led to significant financial penalties for Samsung and have been viewed as attempts to stifle competition rather than protect genuine innovations.

App Store Patents: Apple has been known to enforce its patents related to the App Store, targeting other companies that have tried to create similar platforms. This has sometimes been criticized as an attempt to maintain a monopoly over app distribution for iOS devices.

HTC Lawsuit: In 2010, Apple filed a lawsuit against HTC for allegedly infringing on 20 Apple patents related to the iPhone’s user interface and underlying architecture. Some viewed this as an aggressive move to slow down the growth of Android devices.

Patent Assertions Against Smaller Companies: There have been instances where Apple has asserted its patents against smaller companies or startups. Critics argue that these actions can stifle innovation and competition, as smaller companies often lack the resources to fight prolonged legal battles against a giant like Apple.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

App Store Patents

“Apple denies that, based on their common meaning, the words ‘app store’ together denote a store for apps”

Actual quote from a legal filing by Apple in 2011. It’s about copyright but the effect and intent is the same. They wanted Amazon to not use the term “app store”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Did you generate this with chat gpt? And that’s not being a patent troll. A patent troll is specifically a company that buys up patents, that they do not intend to use and never do, and then sue for them. E.g. a company that does nothing, produces no value, and simply takes others to court for what they own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

They quite literally tried to claim that they invented the rectangle with rounded corners…

https://www.engine.is/news/category/in-apple-v-samsung-scotus-sided-with-reason-over-rounded-corners

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

couldn’t you at least choose a name with different initials?

permalink
report
reply
53 points

It’s the whole point. They’ll try to take over the AI brand by doing this.

"So what does AI actually stand for? "

“It stands for Apple Intelligence, of course!”

“Wow, Apple really is everywhere, they are so good and competent.”

This will happen too often.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The worst part about this is us calling it “Apple intelligence” ironically will make idiots believe that to be correct.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

yeah but then it doesn’t make sense to refuse to call it AI.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

It does, because now it’s their own thing.

So instead of having what everyone else is having, they have their own and also hijack theirs, because Apple put the company name in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

iIntelligence?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 542K

    Comments