Run your own unbound or bind resolvers!

1 point

I’m glad it’s only the football streaming sites, but I don’t much like that companies get this kind of legal power.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Is it possible to get unbound to talk to the root servers via TLS/HTTPS by now?

I’m currently using Quad9 because they support DNS over TLS and DNS over HTTPS.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Yes its possible 👍

Use:

forward-zone:
  forward-addr: 9.9.9.9@853#dns.quad9.net
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That is what I’m doing currently but now unbound doesn’t talk to the root servers anymore, it sends all queries to Quad9.

Both scenarios are not ideal because you always end up with one entity knowing all your queries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Perhaps you could configure more than unbound service behind a loadbalancer. Each unbound instance is configured to use different upstream dns servers.

Double check if unbound doesn’t allow you to randomly hop between dns upstreams first, but the above solution should work if that’s unavailable atm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not sure you would even need encryption. Surely It can’t be illegal to ask the root servers (and all the other DNS servers involved, because the root servers only have IPs for TLD DNS servers) for IPs

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not illegal but it leaves all your DNS lookups in plain text with your ISP, which just doesn’t sit right with me.

Not that the ISP in my country would care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Also introduces the possibility of DNS poisoning

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I just want to point out the Technitium project as an alternative to unbound and bind resolver as well.

Regardless, it’s really easy to setup your own DNS resolver that resolves to DNS roots.

permalink
report
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
19 points

Apparently Cisco operates a popular DNS resolver? Never heard of that before.

And definitely don’t learn how to use a VPN. Or set up Unbound or Bind or PowerDNS Recursive…

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Cisco bought OpenDNS a few years ago,

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Ah crap, good to know. This sucks though, I was thinking of using it to replace CF. What’s left? Quad9 and the unbound type?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Uncensoreddns is a great alternative.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

ATM I’m using Quad9 and OpenNIC but I’m not sure how much of everything do they cover. I’m also not well aware of any other good “flat DNS” alternative (aka: one you can put right into your /etc/resolv.conf / Windows LAN config, without need of extra internal service).

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Cisco operates from the ISP side, they’ll poison DNS through their routers. And you should be aware that your ISP will employ Deep Packet Inspection which can also be done with Cisco routers. That means they can intercept internet traffic, especially if your internet connection is not encrypted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Guess ill be trying my hand at building my own pfsense router

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

ISPs were already required to block the sites. I don’t think an additional block on the Cisco side would change anything in that case.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-fi Liberapay

Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.5K

    Posts

  • 81K

    Comments