138 points

A broken clock etc etc

Also, relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/2030/

permalink
report
reply
75 points
*

A classic. By the way electronic with paper trail gives you faster counts, a way to validate the results and recompute them by hand when there’s an issue.

And doing voting over multiple days and/or by mail in ballots gives you time to count everything.

The people pushing for same day and only that day with all votes counted that day just ignore the logistics and practicality of having people vote. Or, I suspect, rather like that it makes it impossible for highly populated areas to have their votes counted while lower populated areas votes are counted.

I’ve seen pushes for mail in ballots to be held and not counted until Election Day and then only those ballots counted by the end of Election Day counted. Which is absurd. Do mail in, count them up to and after. Or count them up to and give people with mail in ballots access to them a lot earlier. So they can be accurately counted leading up to Election Day.

Of course the logistics of having people able to monitor those ballots over a larger period of time is tricky too. Hence why they’re often not counted until day of and so, by extension, result in ballots not being fully counted for a few days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Having multiple days of open voting would be a game changer for some people. It can be absurdly difficult to actually get the day off, depending on the employer, and I’ve had ones try to treat it as a “perk”, like it shouldn’t be the damned baseline that we’re able to actually take part in the democratic process they’re parading around like a shiny bauble.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Personally I think they should do something like opening the polls on October 1st and then have November 1st be closing day, and all through October we take a page from the aussies and just have a rolling cookout/party at each of the polling places.

Ya get your “I voted sticker” any time in the month and can walk right in for beer and hot dogs and heck maybe even some of Kronk’s spinach puffs if that one guy can make Babish’s recipe work like he said he was gonna at the planning meeting for who’s bringing the goods, and best of all, it’s rolling for a month, so you’ve got every opportunity to stop in and cast your ballot, or just to come back with your “I voted” sticker to keep enjoying the festivities!

This is our most sacred institution as a nation, we should be making a celebration out of it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

In Minnesota, the law requires employers to give employees time off (of their choosing) to vote. At my previous job where they were anal about time in the office, I made a point of voting in the middle of the day which would require another commute. When I got the nasty email about “break too long”. I just replied with a link the statute. And made sure all my co-workers knew what their rights were.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ve had ones try to treat it as a “perk”

Damn. “Perk” of being citizen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

One day only in person voting is purposeful suppression of votes.

Also, am coder, 100% agree with xkcd. I’m still amazed the Internet itself works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

It is theoretically possible to devise a mathematically secure electronic voting system using cryptography, but only if everyone can follow instructions perfectly and people can understand how it works and why their vote is secure. In other words, not in any way that would work in real life.

The principal benefit of pen-and-paper voting is that it is really easy to convince people that taking a ballot paper into a booth, marking it, and then depositing the ballot into a locked glass box which is later counted in front of a room of independent observers is a secure way to run elections. It is impossible to convince the average voter that cryptographically secure voting schemes are actually immune from tampering.

Edit: I never understood why we have “election days”. Why not have an “election week”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m still amazed the Internet itself works.

Same here. FWIW, it’s built on older, slower, less-reliable tech, which forced ridiculous amounts of resiliency into every layer of the design. It’s still amazing, but perhaps slightly less so if we look back 40 years. I’m convinced that some parts are running just fine over infrastructure no better than wet string.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The people pushing for same day and only that day with all votes counted that day just ignore the logistics and practicality of having people vote.

Oh, I can assure you that-

Or, I suspect, rather like that it makes it impossible for highly populated areas to have their votes counted while lower populated areas votes are counted.

I never should have doubted you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Of course the logistics of having people able to monitor those ballots over a larger period of time is tricky too.

When city falls asleep, mafia awakens

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yah, on this particular thing, he’s not wrong.

Everythinge else, though, he’s fucking batshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points
*

Blockchain technology based (BBVS) could be safer but regular EVMs are still hackable

Trustless systems are always better than centralised systems especially when the government in power is also in authority to decide whether they continue to stay in power.

US has been blessed till now.

But look at Russian or North Korean elections. They also use paper ballots

I am confident that Putin is not gonna last if they go for a blockchain based voting system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No it wouldn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

The problem is not being secure; it is convincing people that it is secure. Even the stupidest person understands that marking off a paper in a booth and then depositing it in a locked box is secure. The voting method must give voters confidence that their vote was counted, the election was fair, and the results are legitimate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

That gives so much more opportunity for human intervention.

A good locksmith is all it takes to manipulate the votes.

Even if you keep it under tight security and surveillance they can bribe the security.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Also, you can recount papers if you think something somewhere went wrong for some reason. You can’t manually recheck software.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Exactly what I was thinking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Seems almost paradoxical but yeah physical voting is the way to go https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LkH2r-sNjQs

permalink
report
reply
19 points

As others have said, the scalability ideal is to have electric/mechanical counters but with paper ballots. Keeps the paper trail for double checking, but also allows poll workers to deliver quick initial results to everyone breathing down their necks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Pretty sure that’s how we do it up on Canada. I think random samples are hand-counted to make sure the machine count is accurate. There’s early voting too so not all just in one day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’ve never used a machine in 40 years of voting in Canada. And if they show up, I won’t use them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Well here in Germany we have about 40-50 million votes to count in a federal election. Right when the booths close we get an exit poll that is already pretty close. After 1-2 hours there are extrapolations that are even closer and next morning, there is usually the certified result. All on paper, counted by hand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Unfortunately the software we use(d?) to transmitt and add up the votes is abysmal:

https://www.ccc.de/de/updates/2017/pc-wahl

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0J61-t3OJKg

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

My state does Scantron style ballots. You fill in the little ovals and put it into a machine to be counted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Did Musk figure out people will always rather want the opposite of what he is yapping about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

Reminder that this fucking moron is pushing Twitter as a financial tool. He wants you to use X like you would use your credit card.

But voting machines are insecure?

permalink
report
reply
23 points

He wants you to use X like you would use your credit card.

I won’t even use xitter like social media. Why in hell would I consider it as a credit card? Oh, I get it. The target audience is the idiot army.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He wants you to use X like you would use your credit card.

I should have seen this coming.

That same year, Musk co-founded X.com, a direct bank. X.com merged with Confinity in 2000 to form PayPal. In October 2002, eBay acquired PayPal for $1.5 billion. (wikipedia)

Aw man, he’s trying to build Paypal? Again?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
*

“hundreds of voting irregularities”

Out of how many votes? Oh, enough votes that hundreds of irregularities is statistically irrelevant? Cool, just checking.

Oh, a fraction of a percent of the thousands of manual votes that Republicans had and tried to have thrown out so that dumps could win in 2020? k, just checking.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Counterpoint: whatever methods Kemp used in GA to rig his election and erase the evidence point to significant flaws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Might want to /s that.

Reads pretty straight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Isn’t this the doofus who wanted to send a submarine into a cave? Dude doesn’t have the intellectual heft necessary to manage a QuikTrip in Topeka.

But, take this drivel seriously. They like it when rural, red areas report their vote totals first, so that the news outlets will report that Republicans are “leading” early in the evening, before the blue cities finish their counting and overtake the early totals. It’s a cheap trick to sell the claim that the election was stolen to their followers, y’know, the people who think that chocolate milk comes from brown cows.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

wasn’t it a big tube? like an inflatable tube? this guy loves tubes

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There was a survey a few years ago that found that some absurdly-large number of Americans think that chocolate milk is produced by brown cows. Like, over 10 million people. I hope it’s not true, but it’s become kind of a meme to convey that Americans are misinformed about a lot of things, and generally just really dumb.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it’s a major figure or a politician.

Community stats

  • 7.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 994

    Posts

  • 44K

    Comments