12 points

This is pure genocide apology. Even if it were true that the hostages were held by civilians, the 200+ Palestinians killed were not all holding the hostages. The 600+ injured were not holding the hostages. What a disgusting article. So because a few people “deserved it” we can massacre civilians. Fuck off

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Ah yes, newsweek. Truly a paragon of human rights advocacy.

permalink
report
reply
-7 points
*

(Edit: There used to be a comment here where I was trying to say the blaming the Palestinians for fighting back, on any level, is unreasonable.)

(What I actually wound up saying was victim blaming in a grossly unfair fashion. I’m taking it down. The reply down further below where I try to explain it a little bit better, I’m leaving up, although that one also may still be unfair.)

permalink
report
reply
5 points

So babies and children and the parents caring for them are cowards? That was the dumbest thing I’ve read this month. Congratulations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Then you are a coward and a piece of shit of the absolute highest order

I think that’s pretty easy for you to say from the outside looking in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

I’m not saying anything against someone who for one reason or another (like that they are 2 years old or something) isn’t taking part in fighting, or just wants to live and not to be a part of the killing on either side.

I’m saying that if you don’t “align” yourself mentally against the invaders while they’re killing your family and blowing up your country, then yes, I think you’re a piece of shit. Meaning, it makes no sense to punish ordinary Palestinians or treat it as anything wrong with them if they are “aligned” against the Israelis or willing to take part in anti Israeli activities, no matter who they are. That may make them “not civilians” legally, but to remain a fully unaligned-with-the-conflict civilian, all the way up until your house is the one getting blown up and you and your family are the dead ones, is unequivocally wrong. In my opinion, and maybe I have no right to say that. You’re right that I’m just saying it from the outside without the slightest idea of the reality of what I’m talking about.

The solution is to stop the Israelis from brutalizing Palestine in a way that anyone with a shred of human spirit would try to resist against. The solution is not to decide that now that they’ve done that, any Palestinian who doesn’t like it isn’t a civilian anymore, so it’s okay to kill them too.

(And if someone in Palestine doesn’t care and just wants to get away and be safe, then that is fine. Not saying anything against that. And if they want to work for peace, and that’s their resistance, then great. That is much better. But I’m saying you can’t blame someone for fighting back in a situation this desperate and unfair.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

There is no metal gymnastics western media won’t do to provide Israel blank check for their ethnic cleansing campaign.

The goal is that Israel’s guilt is socialized among all of us…

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Sure, let’s do start using it correctly. I’ll go first:

Israel is engaged in mass murder of Palestinian Civilians.

permalink
report
reply
-34 points

Let me go second.

Hamas uses child soldiers to attack Israel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

80% of Hamas has been orphaned by Israel. Israel has destroyed nearly all the schools. Israel has been starving the Gazans for decades

Israel tries Palestinian children in military court for decades, without parental or legal representation.

But sure buddy go off on your propaganda

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Are you saying that they are not using child soldiers? It seems to me like you’re just making excuses for them using child soldiers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

How many of the over 10,000 children killed were soldiers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

That’s a good question, how many does it take for it to be considered a problem?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Tsk, tsk, tsk. You didn’t use “Palestinian” or “civilian” in that sentence. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Religion can fuck right off in this discussion. It’s definitely a core reasons this war is happening in the first place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Got it, so that makes it alright to kill 30,000 civilians who aren’t child soldiers.

I’m glad you reset my moral compass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

How exactly do you fight a terrorist organization who uses children as both soldiers and human shields without any sort of civilian casualties?

You realize this style of warfare that Hamas has chosen is specifically designed to lead to civilian deaths right?

They could all line up on an open area and fight Israel soldier to soldier, but they choose not to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Starving children, bombed hospitals and schools, whole neighborhoods reduced to rubble… Yeah let’s worry about properly defining “civilian”.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 468K

    Comments