127 points

Can’t imagine how this could be perceived as anything but retaliation for the EU daring to attempt to regulate Apple

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Yeah exactly. Remember when they wanted to kill PWAs in Europe blaming the DMA? They had to revert course eventually due to backlash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It’s very easy for them to twist the history. Losing PWA would have really sucked. I use those quite extensively, even if they aren’t perfect

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Me too! I even develop some PWAs. It’s great for specialized stuff that doesn’t need to be on the AppStore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh, I missed them having to backpedal on that! That’s good news.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That was my first thought.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Nah, it makes sense. Apple really likes their proprietary walled garden, so the interoperability requirements trouble them deeply.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

No.

Interoperability is only required, if you have a significant market share. Apple does not have this in the EU. iMessage specifically doesn’t fall under this regulation, since hardly anyone uses it.

And since Apple plans to publish an SDK for their intelligence anyway, you can’t really regulate them for being too closed.

So either that’s a purely political retaliation, or their “super privacy friendly” services aren’t as privacy friendly as they claim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Apple does have a significant market share of 25-30% in Europe. Just because they avoided having to open iMessage (for now) because everyone in Europe uses WhatsApp, doesn’t mean other Apple services are safe from regulation.

But I’m with you - it’s more likely about (not so) privacy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

or their “super privacy friendly” services aren’t as privacy friendly as they claim.

I would bet real currency it’s this one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
90 points

Funny how companies believe they are punishing you by withholding AI crap nobody wants.

permalink
report
reply
46 points

Data privacy AND not having to deal with more bullshit AI? Oh my, how will we ever cope with this… /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

wasn’t the main point of apples ai that it runs on device? asking explicitly every time it might need to send data anywhere else seems fine

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There’s apparently different tiers, where some stuff is done locally but anything slightly complex would require it go to apple’s servers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points

Apple’s may start being salty and blame everything on anti-trust from now on.

Why were your beans cold this morning? EU’s DMA.

Why did you get delayed to your event? EU’s DMA.

Why did it rain on the one day you were planning to take a trip? EU’s DMA, of course.

permalink
report
reply
60 points

sounds like EU really dodged that bullet. Good on them.

permalink
report
reply
-33 points

Y’all just becoming luddites afraid of big scary tech. Oh no, the big bad siri 2 is going to hurt me!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Why are you using Lemmy then? Go back to reddit if you aren’t scared of them

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Don’t interact with these people. He’s clearly a moron, purposefully using provocative slurs

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I didn’t realize Lemmy was so restrictive. 🙄

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

What are you going on about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s what they said about bitcoin, and there’s still nothing useful at any kind of scale outside of scams.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Look into what the luddites actually where, instead of repeating propaganda

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Lololol not sure what you even think it’s going to change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Who cares.

If Apple don’t want to compete fair in the market, then others will.

And no iPhone user will miss an AI feature. Most of them don’t even understand how to use 80% of the phones features anyway.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

then others will

Unfortunately, I don’t think the others want to compete fair either. It’s a big race to shove garbage to consumers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well, if it’s illegal to do otherwise, some must do it, because the money involved are big.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I cant wait for all the small smartphone manufacturers and os developers to come up with their solutions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Dumb phones on the rise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

At least it opens up for challenge.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 505K

    Comments