00-Evan
In that case you might want to reconsider the use of the term ‘AI’ in your description of such images, which unfortunately means something very specific when it relates to images on the internet right now. Is there any reason why you wanted to use this apparently very sophisticated custom approach when something extremely simple like a nearest-neighbor upscale already works very well for pixel art?
What software is that, out of curiosity? Either you’re not referring to the same type of AI as the type of generative machine learning algorithms that are commonly used today (which is a fair misunderstanding, given all the naming is marketing BS and not at all descriptive of the technology) or you’re referring to a locally run generative model, which still needs a huge amount of training that was presumably done by it’s developer before distributing the model to run locally.
Sorry but I’ve removed your post. AI generated content is not allowed here as it violates rule 3: “Do not use other’s work without giving credit”. Generative AI is trained using vast amounts of other people’s work, taken without consent, and so giving credit is impossible.
I do think showing off the Cleric’s spritesheet is a neat idea though (If I could have just edited your comment I would have) so here is the coment with the AI generated image replaced with an upscaled one:
"
The original leather sprites from 12/08/2012.
upscaled:
Great way to bring back a classic.
"
Afraid that is intended, artifacts need to be identified to work, so they aren’t included in the logic for the shard of oblivion currently.