97xBang
this is so fucking validating. thanks for sharing.
It has been my experience that the best persona to use at work is one of no humanity. Be a corporate robot. When you walk in those doors, kill any sense of emotion. Look at everything logically. Make no friends. Focus on the tasks that your performance is measured. Leave no room for misinterpretation.
Most people are cool, but some are hunting for opportunities. Don’t give those people any opportunities.
I think that what happened with the Boeing 737-MAX crashing was that they had a sensor that if it got stuck, the software was programed to make the plane pitch down, even overriding the pilot’s own input. That resulted in the deaths of 346 people.
If it’s Boeing, I ain’t going.
I told a psychologist that I was being abused. I gave her examples of things my girlfriend was doing. She smiled and told me to do things that made it much worse. She told me that I wasn’t allowed to have privacy because it would prove to my girlfriend that I was cheating. When I finally escaped, I told her that I didn’t know what was real. She smiled at me and said we would discuss it at our next session. It was explicitly our final session.
I keep asking AI for reasons that would make that okay. What possible reason could she have for doing that? AI says there’s no justifiable reason at all. I don’t get it. Nothing makes sense.
We don’t know each other, but if we met, we’d probably understand each other really fast. If there’s an afterlife, I hope we meet up. I’m sure we could both provide each other some validation.
I just tested it. I sent an obviously nude photo via a Google Messages text to myself. I didn’t see any speed bumps sending out or receiving and there was no blurring of the photo, so it doesn’t seem to do what the article says it does. Has anyone seen the app work as they say it does?
I don’t get the “intent” of the quotes at all. Anyone have any idea?
Does it sound as great as it looks?
