It’s a term for insiders. My mother will never talk about “the fediverse.”

The “Open Social Web” is a much better term. It tells you everything you need to know.

This is exactly what we need to get the masses off corporate social media sites.

An app that shows content from across social services has more appeal than being on just bluesky or insta.

It’s only in the nightly builds, so unless you’re on mastodon.social or a server with the latest build you won’t see it yet.

As for what exactly shows when it’s live, someone posted it was in their notifications.

Very good points! Ultimately, we’ve got to rid ourselves of corporate social media.

BTW, if you haven’t seen the EFF article on the Fediverse it makes similar arguments.

Lastly, it’s incumbent on all of us to evangelize the fediverse whenever and wherever we can. Most people aren’t aware of the open social web and its myriad benefits.

Once it’s implemented in Mastodon, it should make it easier to request the same feature from the Lemmy devs.

Using the term “Open Social Web” instead of fediverse or mastodon seems to help a lot. TechCrunch and other news orgs use the term more nowadays and Meta mentions it as well as the about us on Bluesky.

This is the most common reply to any mention of onboarding newcomers, but it’s not helpful. It’d be much more productive to hear specific criticisms so we can address them.

• Is clicking the big “Join” (the default server) on joinmastodon.org really that big of a hurdle?
• Is a firehouse home feed required to engage users from the start?

Correct.

Here’s a thread about who owns and funds Bluesky.

Open AI changed to a for profit company in a heartbeat and these folks can too.

More worrying is who owns them and their funding sources.

Yeah, that’s on me.

Normally I’d post the image and copy over the post body, however, this account is too new to upload images, so I’ve been linking directly to mastodon.