User's banner
Avatar

Forbo

Forbo@lemmy.ml
Joined
3 posts • 46 comments

Sad soy boi beta cuck from the webbernets, planet Erf.

Direct message

I’m also interested to learn more. Quick search yielded nothing, so I dunno what they’re referencing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Please, for the love of all that is good, just give us a Linux client for Drive.

permalink
report
reply

…Signal’s never had federation, though. That’s been one of the biggest sources of criticism toward Moxie’s design decisions for the platform.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Pound a lot of liquid IV or similar electrolyte supplement. You should be able to dilute enough to fly under the detection thresholds but still have enough vitamin/mineral content that it doesn’t get rejected. Had this happen to someone I know who was smoking daily and had a prescription for an amphetamine ADD med, neither showed on their test results.

permalink
report
reply

I wouldn’t rely on the size of the address space to provide security. It’s possible to find hosts through methods other than brute force scanning. I remember seeing a talk from a conference (CCC? DEF CON? I can’t remember) where they were able to find hosts in government IPv6 address space (might have been DOD?) through stuff like certificate transparency logs and other DNS side channels.

Man, I need to go find that talk now…

Edit: I don’t think this is the one I saw previously but is in a similar vein: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AayifEqLbhI

permalink
report
parent
reply

I laughed.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Scenario time: A loved one has recently passed away, and I want to find all the photos I have of them. I would love to be able to have a local AI perform facial recognition to help me find these photos. The classification and tagging info doesn’t get fed into surveillance capitalist garbage, and I’m still able to benefit.

permalink
report
parent
reply

“What is this level of grand security…” Enumerated here: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

Once manufacturers can implement those things, then you will have an alternative to Google hardware for running Graphene. I’m not telling people to trust anything, don’t put words in my mouth.

Who is PrivacyPhones and why should I believe they are in any way affiliated with Graphene?

permalink
report
parent
reply

GrapheneOS has defined a set of security standards for their operating system which have hardware requirements. These standards have been published and there have been efforts to engage with hardware manufacturers to adopt the required hardware. Blame the manufacturers for skimping on security, rather than Graphene being unwilling to compromising their values.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I wouldn’t because I am not a dev. I stay in my wheelhouse and don’t try to pitch features as something they aren’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply