Thank you I’ll read about this.

Right. If the company keeps their money, they have money, for money things. Like giving the staff money, to make others products for money.

If they stack all their money, shove it up a lawyer’s ass, and send them waddling in the Nintendo front door, they apparently have bravery, but, alas, no money.

It would be poor leadership to “go into the ground”.

Hmm it is good to highlight if the company can remotely disable the vehicle.

That means they could also remotely change the driving characteristics, as long as it had a data connection. Like, disabling the brakes.

This dude is shit and musk is shit but this is a universal worry for web connected vehicles.

If I recall correctly such tampering was suspected to even be involved in a journalist’s death way back in 2013. However this is speculation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hastings_(journalist)

He’s daffy duckin

Like schrutebucks right?

Right observer could be observing unlabeled lol

Right and their current assessment (from their legal team) clearly is that they have a case to defend themselves.

Yuzu, based on their actions, determined they didn’t.

Edit as such, spending the money would have been just burning it.

It’s not bravery

The claims are very different. I’m not moving the goalposts here, it’s critical to the situation and was always available information.

What’s millions to Nintendo? Yuzu’s a business at it’s core. they are designed to make money

Lol this is hilarious. “Coward”. Have you ever looked down the barrel of an enterprise legal team, and seen just the opening bill to defend team? I haven’t, but I’m aware that it is a huge and expensive endeavor and “bravery” has nothing to do with it.