Someonelemmy

Even more ironic, he said no one would be swayed by an out of touch billionaire that can’t identify with them…

Apparently its the other way around. This tech is old: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jul/19/robots-research

News to me. I loved the game andI really thought the plot was original.

Well now I just D.A.R.E. the cops to stay off drugs. Just say “no”, you hypocritical bastards

That’s encouraging. Just when I thought nothing would come of the protests. Now to see if the vote actually pass a motion to divest.

🤢

Ahhh, I’m just a warm, toasty cinnamon bun…

“The package is also running headlong into the schedule in the Senate, which is expected to begin the impeachment trial of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on April 11.”

OMFG… The priorities.

Ok. So, replace him with who?

I’m not so sure SCOTUS would rule that way. Even Gorsuch ruled in favor of lgbtq rights because it is such obvious discrimination: https://www.npr.org/2020/06/15/863498848/supreme-court-delivers-major-victory-to-lgbtq-employees#:~:text=Gorsuch couched his opinion in,or transgender without discriminating …

Hillary couldn’t win using the “Trump is dangerous” platform, but she’s absolutely been proven right. The question now is, do enough people care about something as existential as the end of democracy, or are they too focused on inflation and gas prices.