TiggerYumYum

You say the instance is full of angry weirdos but the only one I’ve seen is you. We aren’t impressed with your JD antics.

Maybe taking it a little too seriously, but thank you for putting a joke in there at the end.

Sadly you are most likely correct. I’m not sure what to do because it doesn’t feel like voting and volunteering are working.

Really! It almost feels like trolling to be an American company and push an update on a major cooking holiday. Lol

I wish this would only damage the billionaires.

Lol what a time to push updates. I would donate that smoker and never buy that brand again if it happened to me.

I wasn’t being technical. I was giving a light hearted ribbing to someone younger. When you counter that with “well actually” you take the fun out of it.

Okay, last reply then. You do not understand how covenants work. You called them co-ops earlier, further proving you don’t know. Property management companies are not the owners of condos, same as HOAs who are also not the owners of properties. You do not understand why these distinctions are important and why they function differently for different residencies.

You do not understand nationalization. You focus on one piece of critical infrastructure, and ignore the rest. Like buses, airlines, banks, ferries, steel mills, broadcasting companies, healthcare, post offices, electrical companies, mortgage associations - many of which weren’t failing and were nationalized for other reasons. Just like you cherry pick three countries and ignore the rest. Those three countries are oppressive, that’s why you don’t want to live there. Not because of nationalization. You really are just disingenuous. You didn’t read anything.

Forbes is corporate propaganda.

I already made my point about desirability. I don’t need to make it again just because you refuse to read anything.

Oh look, you didn’t read again. The voucher system should be transitory to providing and guaranteeing housing to all citizens.

I’m done talking to someone so disingenuous. Bye.

Younger people always remind me that they are young. I have used many clocks over many years that I need to manually reset. Younger people don’t seem to realize that most people have appliances they don’t want to connect to the internet.

Very silly.

There are apartments, townhomes, duplexes, condos, single family homes, bungalows, and maybe more I am forgetting. Pretty easy to look up if you actually tried. For MDUs, condo associations do that all the time, and even though I hate them, HOAs serve the same purpose for single family units. Again, all easily searched if you took the time to. This could be transitory to simply providing housing through HUD.

Here’s a list of countries that have nationalized businesses, usually relating to critical infrastructure. Which housing would fall under. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nationalizations_by_country

Not that insane, just disingenuous of you to say that. Plenty of countries here that I would live in. Australia, Spain, France, Germany, Portugal, Japan, Netherlands, Sweden, Iceland, New Zealand, Finland, Canada, UK, Indonesia - all have nationalized businesses within recent/modern history and businesses haven’t fled those countries en masse. And of course, go ahead and take a look at nationalization in the United States. It sounds to me like you were trying to make a point about certain countries YOU don’t like, and ignoring all the other countries that have nationalized businesses, which includes the one we live in! Maybe you should reconsider your internal biases.

Forbes is not a good source. Lol

That’s not an issue of enough housing for people to live in. Desirability is a separate issue tackled through improving the local economy, job offerings, amenities, etc.

How would I lower the prices? If you listened earlier I mentioned increasing the availability of housing vouchers and also lowering the requirements for eligibility.

It doesn’t feel like people read what I say so I think I will end the conversation here. Take care.