![Avatar](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.kbin.social%2Fmedia%2F2a%2F58%2F2a58ed2814a71777a62473b3b3509123469b9ca1e6c44894bb1ff7b0d9ee44d8.png&w=3840&q=75)
![Avatar](/_next/image?url=%2Flemmy-icon-96x96.webp&w=3840&q=75)
jaror
All the side effects were never mentioned to me
I am innocent of uncontrolled abuse
The symbolic rewriting is interesting.
I do wonder what “modern-style” functional programming means.
Also their FAQ says:
But considering other FPLs like Haskell and ML, Pure’s library support isn’t bad
Clicking that link reveals a list of about 34 libraries. In comparison, Haskell’s current curated Stackage snapshot has 3340 packages in it (the total number of packages is probably more than 10x that). So, I think it is odd to claim its ecosystem is anywhere near Haskell’s.
The reason I want to follow that account is actually because I’m not seeing their posts, even though they use #haskell and I’m subscribed to that hashtag (and my magazine https://kbin.social/m/haskell is “subscribed” to that hashtag). Is there any way to get their posts to show up in the microblog?